Hard one - this watch any good? (Ref 2325, Pontife hands)

Posts
2
Likes
1
Hi guys - I am new here registration-wise, but I have in the past spent a fair amount of time going through this forum when I was purchasing my own 168.005 pie pan Connie. Through that experience, I think I honed my skills somewhat at spotting sly redials.

This one has perplexed me though. It looks to be in slightly "too good" condition dial wise for its age, but the signature/logo looks "good" to me, and the minute marks are certainly well done if this is a redial. Hands are definitely a known variation. Movement serial # vs expected watch age checks out. Case markings look right. Crown is right.

But I cannot find an example of this dial font for the hour markers. The G on OMEGA is also slightly different from contemporaries, though there are obviously variations across dial "models".

What do you guys think?

 
Posts
8,082
Likes
36,494
I don't know this ref at all, but based on looking at many vintage Omega's over the years my first impression is very positive of an original watch in extremely good shape.
 
Posts
18,615
Likes
38,624
I have to agree with that. The dial looks very nice, hands look a bit too blue, but that may be lighting. Crown is one of the last designs (bowler hat) before the Ω came in. The 30T2 looks to be in great condition. The only issue seems to be the regulator at full retard, maybe done to slow the watch down because it needs a service?
A very nice example that hasn't aged like many of us have.
 
Posts
291
Likes
356
@adhoc if you don't buy this, do you mind letting me where to find it?

This thing is QUITE beautiful.
 
Posts
5,648
Likes
9,495
I've seen that Dial before. Quite sure, it's done by Causemann, Germany. He has the Original Fonts for that. Anything written under the 6 ? Should be late 1940's.
 
Posts
3,617
Likes
7,699
All parts of the watch: case, movement, dial and hands are in same excellent condition, they "match".
Hence IMO the dial is original.
 
Posts
8,082
Likes
36,494
All parts of the watch: case, movement, dial and hands are in same excellent condition, they "match".
Hence IMO the dial is original.
What do you think of the crown, bowler style but very bulbous indeed?
 
Posts
3,617
Likes
7,699
What do you think of the crown, bowler style but very bulbous indeed?
This kind of crown is perfectly fine for the era and also the ref.
Here is one of my ref 2325
 
Posts
2
Likes
1
Thank you all for your assistance. I am considering purchase of this watch. We will see how it goes. I will keep you all updated. The Causemann dials comment does gives me pause however.