Forums Latest Members
  1. Zain Jul 13, 2015

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    these were issued to Pakistan Air Force in 1963

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/271925766726Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network
     
  2. Joe K. Curious about this text thingy below his avatar Jul 13, 2015

    Posts
    1,648
    Likes
    2,100
    Nice way to promote the listing......
     
  3. Zain Jul 13, 2015

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    NO, just want to increase my posts and likes to participate in full....
     
  4. Togri v. 2.0 Wow! Custom title... cool Jul 13, 2015

    Posts
    2,475
    Likes
    10,952
    But $4200... :cautious:
     
  5. redpcar Jul 13, 2015

    Posts
    3,683
    Likes
    7,847
    From down here in Texas. Might have to check this guy out. "Watchwholesale" user name is a little optimistic. More like "Watchretail".
     
    Fost and efauser like this.
  6. watchyouwant ΩF Clairvoyant Jul 13, 2015

    Posts
    5,141
    Likes
    8,655
    the back engraving is a problem...... and WAY TOO EXPENSIVE>>>>>>>> kind regards. achim
     
  7. Wongo Jul 13, 2015

    Posts
    511
    Likes
    482
    Does lack of Ranchero on the dial makes it a Ranchero, not just an ordinary black dial Seamaster?
     
    Geo! likes this.
  8. Zain Jul 14, 2015

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    Pakistan air force ordered it with seamaster on the dial... this i know for sure.
     
  9. Pvt-Public Jul 14, 2015

    Posts
    2,302
    Likes
    3,077
    These may be a stupid questions, but here goes anyways.
    Why would the P.A.F order Ranchero's with Seamaster dials? Or am I the only one who thinks this sounds "unusual"?
    How do you know this for sure? Just asking, inquiring minds wants to know.
    Why would the seller have the back off and not include pictures of the inside case back? Other than to hide something?

    And to offer even less authenticity, the lumed numbers don't remotely resemble the aged lume for the indices.

    Or am I being entirely too suspicious of the whole thing?
     
    Edited Jul 14, 2015
  10. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Jul 14, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
  11. Zain Jul 14, 2015

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    i know this because i bought one from a Pakistani guy few years back, i did some research and get to know the Pakistan air force ordered omega Rancehros and Railmasters in 1963 with the seamaster (maybe they like seamaster better) on the dials (also on the railmasters). I sold that to a guy in Japan for around $8K and he knew about it, didn't ask me single question about the authenticity.
     
  12. Zain Jul 14, 2015

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    I don't know regular Rancheros came with seamaster, only PAF ordered them with seamaster.
     
  13. Pvt-Public Jul 14, 2015

    Posts
    2,302
    Likes
    3,077
    Thanks for the clarification, but I would still pass. Unless I could get the contact info for the guy who will pay $8k no questions asked.;)
     
    lenny likes this.
  14. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Jul 14, 2015

    Posts
    12,192
    Likes
    15,692
    Yes, both the Ref. 2990 and 2996 are known with plain, Ranchero and Seamaster dials, depending on the country of original sale.

    I find it odd that this particular listing doesn't show the inside of the caseback, and doesn't even mention the reference number.

    My Spidey sense tingles a bit on this one.
    gatorcpa
     
    flame likes this.
  15. redpcar Jul 14, 2015

    Posts
    3,683
    Likes
    7,847
    I tend to believe your tingles. One tell of deception if the seller does not show pics inside on one watch yet does so on his other vintage watch listings. We know he is capable of removing the case backs but chooses not to do so on this particular item. :cautious:
     
    lenny likes this.
  16. watchyouwant ΩF Clairvoyant Jul 14, 2015

    Posts
    5,141
    Likes
    8,655
    this story is valid for the Railmasters. PAF pilots did not want to be associated with Rail......only these are verified with seamaster dials. a few ground crew had normal omegas. but the markings do not match this example here. kind regards. achim
     
  17. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Jul 14, 2015

    Posts
    12,192
    Likes
    15,692
    He actually did remove the back to show the movement, but not the inside of the caseback.

    Even more suspicious, if you ask me.
    gatorcpa
     
    Pvt-Public likes this.
  18. omar Jul 16, 2015

    Posts
    40
    Likes
    28
    there's a picture of the caseback, at least now.

    (didn't realize this would be my first post. I'd been watching that auction, and found this thread by googling some info. I've been lurking here forever, but I guess I never posted before!. I have sent private messages to some of you though).
     
  19. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Jul 16, 2015

    Posts
    12,192
    Likes
    15,692
    OK. Inside of caseback looks correct. The Ref. 2996 is also correct.

    Only question now is the engraving on the outside. I know absolutely nothing about this, so I leave to the milwatch collectors out there.

    gatorcpa
     
  20. Pvt-Public Jul 16, 2015

    Posts
    2,302
    Likes
    3,077
    45 minutes to go and still no bids.
    UPDATE.... Bidding ended with 0 bids.
    But you can still pick up a different PAF Omega from the same seller only $6.5k.
     
    Edited Jul 16, 2015