Got a new (to me) Tudor BB58 today…

Posts
108
Likes
391
I sold another watch I had not worn in three years and picked up a used Tudor BB58 from Crown and Caliber. The Fed Ex lady dropped it off and I was wearing my 16610 today and snapped a quick picture before I sized the Tudor. Just thought I would share!
 
Posts
612
Likes
1,164
Congratulations! That’s a very nice watch!
I bought one to be my « summer watch » and I don’t regret it!
 
Posts
1,437
Likes
19,000
What made you want the BB58? I see it as an alternative to the Submariner that people buy when they are waiting for Sub, can't afford one, or want to avoid the stigma of owning a Rolex. As you apparently don't fall into any of these categories, I find it curious that you chose to buy one.
 
Posts
397
Likes
403
Congrats. It’s a great watch I find I wear a lot.

Also a great time to pick up given there’s the other editions floating around so it’s actually reasonably priced.
 
Posts
108
Likes
391
It’s the gilt dial and hands. In my opinion it’s completely different from the 16610 sub, and honestly one could argue it wears a little better (my wrist is 7in). It actually feels and looks more vintage on the wrist than my 16610. The Rolex feels cold compared to the 58 due to the warm colors the 58 has.
I do not feel that it is waiting piece to a Rolex sub, or anything like that. I have other nice watches and honestly I feel this ranks up there with my 1990’s Speedmaster Professional, Omega dress watches, my Planet Ocean, and yes, my 16610. It’s a very nice time piece shouldn’t be viewed as a place holder. I also think this watch bridges the gap between a pure sports/tool watch like the 16610, and something that can fill a larger role with slightly dressier (not a suit or tuxedo) but nice jeans and sport coat, or perhaps proper pants and a coat without tie.
 
Posts
108
Likes
391
Just to add on… I have also always wanted a no date sub… this scratched that itch in a way.
 
Posts
1,579
Likes
15,222
What made you want the BB58? I see it as an alternative to the Submariner that people buy when they are waiting for Sub, can't afford one, or want to avoid the stigma of owning a Rolex. As you apparently don't fall into any of these categories, I find it curious that you chose to buy one.

Because he thought it was a well-built, attractive timepiece? It's questions like this that make me wonder what could possible cause, in your words, "the stigma of owning a Rolex." 🙄 The attitude is that everyone really wants a Rolex, and every watch purchase must be made to somehow fit into that paradigm. Good grief. Apparently, despite this gentleman being a man who simply appreciates watches and buys the pieces that speak to him, he is still going to be questioned about his choice in that light. Ridiculous. Tudor, Omega, JLC, Glashütte Original, et al are not "Rolex alternatives." They are hardly for people who "can't afford a Rolex." They're well-designed, well-executed watches with solid movements and excellent brand history. They each have their own design language and evolution.

It's precisely this attitude that contributes to the stigma, and puts a great brand that makes an excellent collection of watches in a bad light.

edit: noticed an idiotic incorrect pronoun & fixed it
Edited:
 
Posts
1,437
Likes
19,000
Because he thought it was a well-built, attractive timepiece? It's questions like this that make we wonder what could possible cause, in your words, "the stigma of owning a Rolex." 🙄 The attitude is that everyone really wants a Rolex, and every watch purchase must be made to somehow fit into that paradigm. Good grief. Apparently, despite this gentleman being a man who simply appreciates watches and buys the pieces that speak to him, he is still going to be questioned about his choice in that light. Ridiculous. Tudor, Omega, JLC, Glashütte Original, et al are not "Rolex alternatives." They are hardly for people who "can't afford a Rolex." They're well-designed, well-executed watches with solid movements and excellent brand history. They each have their own design language and evolution.

It's precisely this attitude that contributes to the stigma, and puts a great brand that makes an excellent collection of watches in a bad light.

Huh? I never asked why anyone would buy a Tudor when they can have a Rolex. I asked why the OP chose to buy a BB58, an homage to vintage Tudor Submariners - which were literally manufactured to be cheaper alternatives to Rolex Submariners - when he already has a Submariner. This is a very narrow comparison, not some vapid brand comparison you seem to be responding to. (Also, the stigma of owning a Rolex, at least in the context I was referring to, has nothing to do with other watch enthusiasts thinking it’s the be-all-end-all brand and much more to do with non-watch enthusiasts knowing it’s a very expensive luxury brand.) Now, what I find particularly obnoxious is getting this sort of response, i.e. talking about brands instead of watches, when one asks for thoughts regarding two particular watches - although I guess this somewhat unavoidable in a Tudor-Rolex comparison as, again, Tudor was literally established to offer cheaper alternatives to Rolex.
 
Posts
116
Likes
225
What a beauty!

I’m currently looking at the M79230R-0012 or a new Speedy.

Two very different watches but I keep getting drawn back to both of them.
 
Posts
217
Likes
663
SO NICE!!, Tudor is in the correct path, and aware of their customers. As owner of a PO 8500, I am in a crisis after reading about the new PELAGOS FXD, almost everything is better, thickness, simetrical case, no date, titanium, no shinning surfaces, etc...ADVICE: DON´T LOOK TO THE FXD!.
 
Posts
1,579
Likes
15,222
This is a very narrow comparison, not some vapid brand comparison you seem to be responding to. (Also, the stigma of owning a Rolex, at least in the context I was referring to, has nothing to do with other watch enthusiasts thinking it’s the be-all-end-all brand and much more to do with non-watch enthusiasts knowing it’s a very expensive luxury brand.) Now, what I find particularly obnoxious is getting this sort of response, i.e. talking about brands instead of watches, when one asks for thoughts regarding two particular watches - although I guess this somewhat unavoidable in a Tudor-Rolex comparison as, again, Tudor was literally established to offer cheaper alternatives to Rolex.

I apologize for reading your message as the typical "since Rolex is the king of all watches for all time, if you don't buy one, what is the underlying problem with you" post. I'm aware of Tudor's history, and that the BB58 is meant to evoke the 1958 "big crown" Tudor. It's been a long time since 1946, and Tudor has, in my opinion, long ago came out from under the shadow of Max's original intention. They no longer simply create the Toyota instead of the Lexus; their watches are not using the same cases, bracelets, and crowns with a different dial and movement. Perhaps I look too much at the details, since dive watches all have so much in common anyway, but when I look at a BB58 I just don't see a Rolex Submariner. The proportions, case, materials, surfaces, and color are a different character from the modern Rolex. If OP had bought a 79090, and your question worded slightly differently, I would have been interested to hear the answer.

In any case, I hope you have a good day and again apologize for reading into your question. The attitude that I read into it is unfortunately pernicious and omnipresent; I am obviously irritated by it. That doesn't justify jumping down your throat, so to speak.
 
Posts
1,579
Likes
15,222
Returning to the original post, Congrats @Michael C on the purchase! Beautiful pair of watches. I'm a fan of no-date as well, and would love it if Omega would release (other than the NTTD) a no-date SMP. I have a 300 which I love because of it's date-free dial. Nine out of my top twelve most worn are no-date watches. The symmetry of a no-date dial and the ease of setting the time without worrying about the date appeal to me.

EDIT: I just realized what a first-world problem "setting the date" is. It clearly implies changing watches so often that I'm frequently having to reset dates on watches not worn enough to keep them running. I can happily bash myself now. 😬
Edited:
 
Posts
1,046
Likes
5,436
Congrats on the acquisition—I briefly owned the same watch (got caught in a mass consolidation!) and the thing literally looked incredible with almost any nato I threw at it. Enjoy!
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,977
I like these Tudors, I feel like they are continuing a lovely style as Rolex has moved to a different design esthetic (and market). The Rolex/Tudor debate is akin to the BMW/Mini debate. Some have asked my why I bought a mini verses just getting a BMW. I have owned BMW’s for the last 30 years and the mini feels closer to the driving philosophy of BMW 30 years ago than BMW does now. I think Tudor has done the same thing- filled in the gap that was left behind by their parent company.
 
Posts
1,437
Likes
19,000
[...] Tudor has, in my opinion, long ago came out from under the shadow of Max's original intention. They no longer simply create the Toyota instead of the Lexus; their watches are not using the same cases, bracelets, and crowns with a different dial and movement. Perhaps I look too much at the details, since dive watches all have so much in common anyway, but when I look at a BB58 I just don't see a Rolex Submariner. The proportions, case, materials, surfaces, and color are a different character from the modern Rolex.

I guess if we are going to talk about the brands in general, which I do not find particularly interesting, I agree Tudor has developed its own design language and is becoming a brand distinct from Rolex. However, the dial of the BB58 is nearly identical to that of a Submariner except it has some gold accents and a snowflake handset. The overlap in appearance is substantial in my opinion - not that this implies it is inferior to any particular watch. Also, although my original question may have been worded in such a way that it could be interpreted as disapproving of the OP’s choice, it was actually intended as a prompt for him to elaborate without coming across as pontificating on his recent purchase... which he did and I imagine he enjoyed.

Edited for stupid spelling errors.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,246
Likes
4,776
Me? I just wanted a nice reasonably priced available 39mm no date tool watch with timing bezel to wear on a nato. And no...I have not sized the bracelet yet.

have fun
kfw
Edited:
 
Posts
1,534
Likes
3,234
I love the new Tudor BB58 and if I was starting over, it would be the first watch that I would buy. The size and the design are both excellent. I probably won't get one, as I have a 2254.50 that I have had since new and I don’t need another modern diver with a steel bracelet. The BB reverse-panda chrono on the other hand is a different story - that could very well be my next modern watch purchase. Tudor has really upped their game over the past few years!