Getting that last detail right

Posts
5,636
Likes
5,804
The original crystal on my KO 2627 (gold cap over steel) came with a silver-colored retention ring. For various reasons, the crystal it was replaced with had a gold ring.

You guessed it, I sourced a crystal with a silver ring and my watchmaker swapped them for $50.

Of course he thought I was nuts, but money talks.

What lengths have you gone to, to get your vintage Omega to be "just perfect"?
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,983
Spending more on vintage hands, correct bracelet and a service than I paid for the watch

 
Posts
4,763
Likes
12,041
Spending more on vintage hands, correct bracelet and a service than I paid for the watch


The finished product is well worth the cost.
 
Posts
13,148
Likes
18,056
What lengths have you gone to, to get your vintage Omega to be "just perfect"?
Pictures or it didn’t happen.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,692
I've once spent ninety times the purchase cost of a watch getting it serviced...
 
Posts
16,856
Likes
47,864
What lengths have you gone to, to get your vintage Omega to be "just perfect"?

1) Overpayment
2) Messaged a member every few weeks asking if he is looking after my future watch
3) Waited for months/years
D) All of the above
 
Posts
9,555
Likes
52,789
After a 4 year search I acquired this 1959 Geneve reference 2903 last year. Perfect case, perfect dial, perfect hands, all original. The crystal is a generic replacement, but I can live with that. The original crown has a very small crease on it. It winds just fine and the crease is barely perceptible, but I know it’s there. Haven’t been able to find a replacement original crown anywhere. I’ll probably spend the next four years looking for one. This hobby fosters OCD behavior. 😲
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,804
Pictures or it didn’t happen.
gatorcpa
That was then...



This is now.



That original crystal, unforunately, could not be saved.
 
Posts
17,646
Likes
36,912
......That original crystal, fortunately, could not be saved.

FIFY

(I hate cyclops crystals and think the watch looks 100% better without it).
 
Posts
33,562
Likes
38,238
FIFY

(I hate cyclops crystals and think the watch looks 100% better without it).
I used to be a big time hater of the cyclops but I’ve warmed a bit after a few submariners and gmts, still not something I look for but it’s definitely useful even if you’re still young and have good eyesight. I’ve got a couple of watches where the date is just awful that don’t have one that could really use it.
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,804
FIFY

(I hate cyclops crystals and think the watch looks 100% better without it).
I don't like them either but the crystal truly was original.
 
Posts
29,261
Likes
75,674
I used to be a big time hater of the cyclops but I’ve warmed a bit after a few submariners and gmts, still not something I look for but it’s definitely useful even if you’re still young and have good eyesight. I’ve got a couple of watches where the date is just awful that don’t have one that could really use it.

Personally, I find that the Rolex style in particular, make it harder to see the date. You have to rotate the watch so that the cyclops is straight on, or you can’t read the date. The style that are under the crystal, like Omega uses, are a little more forgiving in the angle that the watch can be at and still read the date.

Generally, watches are better off without them IMO...