Genuine 12.68z?

Posts

1,455

Likes

2,054

Rasputin

·Dec 11, 2021

Has anyone seen a 12.68z that is marked “Longine”?

 

Posts

1,455

Likes

2,054

Rasputin

·Dec 11, 2021

Is it possible that this could have been a manufacturing error or is it a situation of “run away, run away”? It looks like an otherwise normal 12.68z.

 

Posts

8,097

Likes

28,528

Tony C.

·Dec 11, 2021·Ωf Jury member

I have little doubt that it is original. Probably like those (very low production) rare coins that had mistakes, except that this watch isn't likely to be worth much extra!

 

Posts

2,959

Likes

6,317

Modest_Proposal

·Dec 12, 2021

I wonder what could have caused such a thing. Did they use presses to make those signatures?

 

Posts

2,820

Likes

4,924

DirtyDozen12

·Dec 12, 2021

I would not run away (everything shown looks okay) but that is an odd flaw. I have seen weakly stamped(?) markings and markings that have been re-stamped but I do not recall seeing this before.

 

Posts

963

Likes

1,251

sleepyastronaut

·Dec 13, 2021

Modest_Proposal

I wonder what could have caused such a thing.

Lunch.

I'm assuming this was done with a pantograph engraver.

Edited: Dec 13, 2021

 

Posts

2,820

Likes

4,924

DirtyDozen12

·Dec 14, 2021

sleepyastronaut

I'm assuming this was done with a pantograph engraver.

I suppose that this would make more sense with the missing number than if "Longines" was stamped.