ELV web
·One other note...the earliest Ninas have the early calibre 130 (Valjoux 72.6) whereas most of the Ninas are found with the later and far more common cal 85 which is the more common standard Valjoux 72.
One other note...the earliest Ninas have the early calibre 130 (Valjoux 72.6) whereas most of the Ninas are found with the later and far more common cal 85 which is the more common standard Valjoux 72.
Those are very early, not all the first gen comes with the 130 in my understanding. So if u have a first gen with 130, they are a rare find.
Agreed...Ive only seen a handful in many years of looking. Mine has a Cal 130...but since the OP's Nina is only about 100 after mine...I would guess his may have the same cal 130
I thought the UG130 was a Valjoux 23, like the UG125? Don't some of the early Big Eyes have the UG130?
I love these confident statements......
- Case is polished, crown is wrong, pushers are wrong, crystal is a replacement and I think subdials hands are replacement too (but not sure)
and
All the hands are correct for this version and it all looks original.
Hello all, I’ve got a good sock drawer story. I finally got my buddy to get into vintage watches. He recalled his dad having some old watches tucked away in the drawer so he gave him a call. Turns out his dad had an old Rolex bubbleback and this UG.
His dad remembers his parents buying as a gift, and he hardly wore it. He doesn’t recall any service history. What are your thoughts on originality? Condition? Polished? The tritium on the chrono hand has fallen out and is spread around the hand and the dial. Otherwise, it’s in pretty nice condition. Lastly, can I get some recommendations for the top service people in USA? Thanks for looking.
The cal 130 is a Valjoux 72.6...also used in the ref 22703/1 and 22704/1(seen below) and my Rolex 6262 (3rd image)
You will rarely find a 50 year old UG with its original crystal. The crown should be a plain U crown, its very common to see these replaced as its standard to replace during service and most watchmakers are just trying to keep the seal tight. Hands are correct for this serial.
Hello all, I’ve got a good sock drawer story. I finally got my buddy to get into vintage watches. He recalled his dad having some old watches tucked away in the drawer so he gave him a call. Turns out his dad had an old Rolex bubbleback and this UG.
His dad remembers his parents buying as a gift, and he hardly wore it. He doesn’t recall any service history. What are your thoughts on originality? Condition? Polished? The tritium on the chrono hand has fallen out and is spread around the hand and the dial. Otherwise, it’s in pretty nice condition. Lastly, can I get some recommendations for the top service people in USA? Thanks for looking.
You are luckier than me, I never ever have a sock drawer 🙁
You are Lucky, there were a hundred and sixty of us living in my dad's sock drawer in the middle of the road! We used to get up out of the sock drawer at twelve at night, and lick the road clean with our tongues. We had half a handful of freezing cold gravel, worked twenty four hours a day at the mill for fourpence every six years, and when we got home, our dad would slice us in two with a bread knife...
That sounds rough.
Do you mean the thin subdial hands?
There are plenty of examples...the earliest Ninas had the thin sub dial hands.
Here is mine also sn 23548xx
BTW- in years of following this reference, Ive not seen another Nina with an earlier serial number than mine. Not saying it doesnt exist, but haven't been able to find one. @southtexas what are the next few digits in your serial?