Flat-link end-piece (6/516, etc.) and lug interface question:

M'Bob · May 20, 2025

Regarding the way end-pieces fit in their corresponding lug ends: I’m aware that solid end-links typically fit very snugly. But regarding stamped steel end-links, published date seems to indicate that the end-link is typically .3mm less in width than the corresponding lug width. For those who have had experience playing with, or have measured this, I was wondering if this is what you’ve found. Thanks.

sathomasga · May 20, 2025

I don't have those specific end links, but here's a 530. No 0.3mm gap here.

M'Bob · May 20, 2025

I’m not familiar with that end-link, but I’m guessing it’s for an 18mm lug? But that would mean it would be tough to get it in there, no?

sathomasga · May 20, 2025

Yes, 18mm lug width, typically with a 1035 bracelet. There’s no gap, but I don’t have any problems installing it.

The only problem I’ve had fitting end links is with my Seiko 6117. Its lug width is usually described as 19mm, but 19mm hollow end links won’t quite fit. I’ve measured the lug width as 18.8mm.

Flat-link end-piece (6/516, etc.) and lug interface question:

M'Bob

sathomasga

M'Bob

sathomasga

Similar threads

Does a 516 and no. 6 end-piece have identical curves...

Flat Link Bracelet Prts: 1039, NOS Expanding/Stretch Links, 6, 506, and 516 Endlinks (& some used)