ETA 2451 Full Cleaning - Where did I go wrong? 900 sec slow

Posts
4,200
Likes
10,033
So I have a watch with an ETA 2451 that always ran erratic with low amplitude. I finally got around to cleaning it. Complete with new mainspring. Re-assembled and had great amplitude at around 270 but it would not track on the timegrapher. Turns out it was running super slow (I had to put on the second hand and check with a chronograph). I set it all the way fast and was able to get it to register around 900 sec slow. Problem was: I was all the way at the end of the adjustment. Slept on it overnight and simply swapped out a junk 2452 balance and it tracked. So it definitely was the balance.

1. Did I do something to lengthen the hairspring?
2. Was the hairspring always out of whack?
3. Did the previous owner replace with the wrong hairspring and never regulate?
4. No, it's not magnetized ;-)

I'm stuck in a corner on what could have gone wrong. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Signed,
Miffed
 
Posts
15,188
Likes
44,616
A lot of us would likely be able to diagnose your problem with the watch in our hands. But otherwise…….!
 
Posts
4,200
Likes
10,033
It was a kick between the legs. Get it all assembled and looks to be running perfect with great amplitude but get the --------------- /s on the timegrapher display and not be able to adjust it in. Swap it out with an uncleaned junker and get 250 amplitude that I can dial in right in the middle of the adjustment range.

It's just something that has never happened to me before. Can the balance swing too far without overbanking? I see where the slug on the hairspring can be adjusted in and out a little but I didn't touch it and the set screw was tight.
Edited:
 
Posts
29,111
Likes
75,238
How much space is there between the regulating pins?
 
Posts
4,200
Likes
10,033
Here is the balance. Already have the watch back together. Possible that I simply needed to adjust the hairspring lug in a little to slightly shorten?
Crappy pics. I'll work on better.

Here's a better one
Edited:
 
Posts
4,200
Likes
10,033
uh oh. Just saw the bent hairspring in the pics. This is the problem?

 
Posts
243
Likes
380
It's probably more helpful to have a good top view with the balance installed in the movement. Fully unwound mainspring, i.e. stationary balance.
And some pics of the timegrapher readings in horizontal and vertical positions.
 
Posts
243
Likes
380
..and a side view to see if the balance is flat.
Have you visually observed/confirmed the 270° amplitude , or is this only based on timegrapher readings?
 
Posts
4,200
Likes
10,033
It was running beautiful is why my head hurt. When I swapped balances, the problem was solved. I'm convinced the issue was with the hairspring. You notice that it is slightly bent which would possibly advance the fulcrum forward (lengthen) out of the adjustment range. It still looked fine when static (from the top). I'll play with it a little bit more when I have more time.
 
Posts
243
Likes
380
It was running beautiful is why my head hurt. When I swapped balances, the problem was solved. I'm convinced the issue was with the hairspring. You notice that it is slightly bent which would possibly advance the fulcrum forward (lengthen) out of the adjustment range. It still looked fine when static (from the top). I'll play with it a little bit more when I have more time.

A bend right at the stud is very common and usually one of the easier hairspring fixes. It's best analysed and even fixed when the balance is in place.
 
Posts
4,200
Likes
10,033
I've seen it and it usually disforms the overall shape. This one is still beautifully round. Simply didn't check. It happens.