oddboy
·Dibs!
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
@Castle4444 do you know if they’re ridged or ridgeless ? Objective here is to find ridgeless examples with known provenance.
I just checked my bracelet stuff now and found 3 ridgeless and 16 ridged. All those end pieces have been with me for a very long time now, so it's not very likely to think they have been faked.
There's also a NOS 7912 bracelet with #6 end pieces, which are ridged.
And after having read this thread here I personally think that the ridgeless were contemporary service parts, maybe from a different producer.
Hope that helps. 😀
This certainly helps if you’re specifically talking about no. 6 endlinks that all share the same characteristic stamp shape as defined by @michael e.
Can you confirm that those 19 endlinks are all no.6, and all have this shape of stamp ?
And also if you have both types in your hands, could you try and ascertain if there are any other differences between the ridged and ridgeless 6s. If there are differences, it would be interesting to compare a ridgeless 6 against a 506.
So I still side with the idea that they’re transitional between the no. 6 and the no. 506, and the new process to make the ridgeless 506s was used to make a few batches of ridgeless 6s.
I am bringing this thread back to life because I stumbled across a 6 today that I think is real but, unlike any others I have seen. The number 6 itself looks correct and it has no ridges but, the inside of the link has a lip. See pics, it has a sort of ledge where the last link goes in and is not an open hole. The best picture to exhibit this is from the top of the end link looking down. You cannot see my hand through the end link because there is a ledge there from manufacturing. Hard to explain.. View attachment 709693