Forums Latest Members
  1. Hattrick May 16, 2017

    Posts
    280
    Likes
    1,012
    20170516_194552.png
  2. SouthernScot May 16, 2017

    Posts
    879
    Likes
    5,624
    That's quite a mixture! Must be a one off, according to the description it has an aluminium case and bracelet!

    ::facepalm2::
     
  3. Davidt May 16, 2017

    Posts
    10,399
    Likes
    18,075
    Donor - which part??

    It'll probably be bought by someone who needs the dial and will part out the rest.
     
  4. 2ar2c1 May 16, 2017

    Posts
    609
    Likes
    3,737
    aah, that really really rare alum case
     
    SouthernScot likes this.
  5. Just Livin May 16, 2017

    Posts
    1,363
    Likes
    6,183
    New transitional discovery? (reaching for MWO as he types........::confused2::)
     
    SouthernScot likes this.
  6. ewand May 16, 2017

    Posts
    1,290
    Likes
    5,852
    Maybe the Transitional Frankenwhite was the beginning of the DNN bezel ;)
     
  7. repoman May 16, 2017

    Posts
    2,248
    Likes
    4,273
  8. cell1010 May 16, 2017

    Posts
    489
    Likes
    954
    Quite good as a donor watch, as the parts seem to be in good shape...
     
  9. ewand May 16, 2017

    Posts
    1,290
    Likes
    5,852
    Not sure I'd agree entirely with you there... might be a good donor if it's hilariously cheap ;)
    The dial looks pretty suss too - no step... a service tritium Ed White dial? And the hands don't match it - the minute hand is too long for an Ed White - see http://speedmaster101.com/105-003/ and you'll notice the tip doesn't quite reach the 1/4sec track whereas on this one...
     
  10. abrod520 May 16, 2017

    Posts
    11,260
    Likes
    35,471
    Even if the dial is authentic, the feet wouldn't fit an 861, so it's either incorrectly attached or it's an 861 dial meaning it's not meant for an Ed White in the first place
     
    SouthernScot, bazamu and gemini4 like this.
  11. Davidt May 16, 2017

    Posts
    10,399
    Likes
    18,075
    Could've sworn I saw a step before, but looking on my phone now, it does look like a flat dial. I'll have to look again on a better screen.
    Narrow T's as well, which would be odd for a flat dial.

    Interesting that's it looks reasonably clean. Not a lot of grime around the pushers. I wonder if these parts have only recently become acquainted?!
     
    Edited May 16, 2017
    SouthernScot likes this.
  12. noiseboyuk May 16, 2017

    Posts
    414
    Likes
    884
    Looks pretty dodgy.
    As mentioned, the most important component - the dial, does not appear to be a step dial. Applied logo, no step, tritium ? All very suspect.
     
  13. khanmu May 16, 2017

    Posts
    1,359
    Likes
    11,151
    I originally bought this watch I February this year...I had it looked at on here and from the photos I took, the consensus at the time was that it was an Ed White dial (could see the step dial in my photos) although the point about the feet was also made. The thread was back in Feb..

    I returned it to the seller and advised them to separate it out as parts, or list out the parts and let someone make the call....
     
    SouthernScot likes this.
  14. Davidt May 17, 2017

    Posts
    10,399
    Likes
    18,075
    Yes, looking again on a large screen, you can see the step.

    It is what it is, a collection of vintage parts, thrown together. No good as a watch for a collection. It's worth purely the sum of it's parts and the final price will depend on how much two people need one or more of them.
     
  15. khanmu May 17, 2017

    Posts
    1,359
    Likes
    11,151
    Agree - the seller was a nice guy, and not a watch expert. he took it back no problem. Hopefully it will be of use to someone who wants the parts...
     
  16. Dash1 May 17, 2017

    Posts
    1,824
    Likes
    3,501
    Unfortunately the valuable part - the dial - most likely has broken or missing feet as it would not otherwise fit the 861 movement. Bracelet definitely not a 1039 as stated.