Early 1930s Reverso Dial Check, Lisica Movement

Posts

52

Likes

4

arajohn

·Apr 2, 2026

Hi everyone,
Would someone who knows early Reversos be able to tell me if this dial is correct for an early reverso? This would be a Reverso with a Lisica movement.
Thanks in advance,
AJ

 

Posts

4,453

Likes

11,353

kyle L

·Apr 2, 2026·Grasshopper

Looks refinished, fonts appear to be in a more modern style. Usually these dials are not in great condition.

 

Posts

4,104

Likes

11,702

Waltesefalcon

·Apr 2, 2026

I'll second redial.

 

Posts

52

Likes

4

arajohn

·Apr 2, 2026

Thanks for the responses. Here is what is confusing me. I saw this article written, but there is not much written regarding the actual watch and the dial:
https://monochrome-watches.com/collectors-series-first-female-collector/

 

Posts

4,104

Likes

11,702

Waltesefalcon

·Apr 2, 2026

I'm going to say that the one featured in that article, if you can call that an article, is also a redial. Anytime I see a watch from the 40s with that white of a dial and no marks of any kind, I am going to say it is a redial. I also don't like the print on it. The case also looks heavily polished as the steps have lost their definition along the the corner edges.

Edited: Apr 2, 2026

 

Posts

101

Likes

435

Xtof

·Apr 8, 2026

I agree about the refinished dial, because of the font. Otherwise, such low serial is OK for early Reverso powered by the Lisica movement. The crown seems also correct.

Here is a scan of an original catalog from the early 1930s.
It is the same configuration for dial and hands (but the case is in gold)