I feel bad for those in Australia having to deal with this, but I can certainly understand any government's frustration with the inability to adapt 19th century laws to 21st century commerce. The governments are losing revenue by people doing business over the internet and are pretty much powerless to stop this tax evasion.
To correct an inaccuracy in the article, there is no GST (or sales tax, as we call it here) in the USA at the federal level. States get to set their own tax rates at anything from zero to infinity. States also get to decide on an what is and isn't taxable. As Dennis can tell you, in New Jersey, clothing is not subject to sales tax. In Florida, it is.
We do have the concept of "use tax", which is equivalent to the sales tax on items purchased out of state (or the USA) on which tax was not charged. If I bought clothes in New Jersey and brought them back to Florida, I would owe a use tax equivalent to the sales tax I would have paid, had I bought them in Florida. Of course, Florida has no means to enforce this law, but it is on the books. Clear as mud, right?
Also, there is no "exemption" amount as mentioned in the article. I think the US$200 is meant to be the amount per person of exemption from federal customs duty upon return from overseas. This has nothing to do with sales tax, use tax or GST, but it reads nicely in the article.
Makes me wonder what else is wrong,
gatorcpa
Click to expand...