- Posts
- 251
- Likes
- 1,190
Nono01
·Hi all,
it's been a while since I posted some new photo content, but I just finished the review of this fabulous Doxa diver and wanted to share some details from the lens perspective. A lot is known about Doxa SUB series and there are multiple discussions and reviews online so i won't bore you with stats, just want to write my experience with this one.
The dial is the key here, it's very small (27mm) when compared with the case size (42,5mm and 13,4mm thick) but that great tonneau case just nails it with a short lug-2-lug (only 45mm). I love the fact that it's the almost 1:1 representation of the original SUB 300 from 1967. A lot of that 13.4mm thickness goes on curved sapphire and bulky caseback, so the watch actually sits quite low on the wrist. Anyway, the dial. Smallish, quirky very readable and just draws your attention. I love it, it's the best part of this watch.
Anyway, this thread is all about the photos, so let them do the talking. As always, thank you for lisen...viewing 😀
it's been a while since I posted some new photo content, but I just finished the review of this fabulous Doxa diver and wanted to share some details from the lens perspective. A lot is known about Doxa SUB series and there are multiple discussions and reviews online so i won't bore you with stats, just want to write my experience with this one.
The dial is the key here, it's very small (27mm) when compared with the case size (42,5mm and 13,4mm thick) but that great tonneau case just nails it with a short lug-2-lug (only 45mm). I love the fact that it's the almost 1:1 representation of the original SUB 300 from 1967. A lot of that 13.4mm thickness goes on curved sapphire and bulky caseback, so the watch actually sits quite low on the wrist. Anyway, the dial. Smallish, quirky very readable and just draws your attention. I love it, it's the best part of this watch.
Anyway, this thread is all about the photos, so let them do the talking. As always, thank you for lisen...viewing 😀
