Forums Latest Members
  1. proximal Apr 23, 2015

    Posts
    287
    Likes
    455
    My coworker wore this into work today. It belonged to his father (really, no uncles are involved). He mentioned that it was serviced a few years ago and the crystal was replaced at that time, but it hasn't been worn very much. It looks to be in fantastic original condition, although the replacement crystal has a date magnifier which I don't think I've ever seen on a Seamaster. Pardon the phone photos.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    He'd love to get some more info about the watch. Reference, approximate production date range (his estimate is "some time in the 60's), and so forth. Also, the original bracelet has been lost; does anyone know the reference number for it?
     
  2. TexOmega Apr 23, 2015

    Posts
    7,308
    Likes
    54,373
    screw off the back and snap some pix of the movement, the serial number will pinpoint the date of production.
     
  3. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Apr 23, 2015

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    Looks like a Seamaster 166.010 powered by a 562/565.
     
  4. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Apr 23, 2015

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
    Some Seamasters came with the magnifier. This is mine. You can see the shadow of the Omega symbol in the middle of the crystal.

    image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg
     
    watch3s and Giff2577 like this.
  5. Hijak Apr 24, 2015

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    Looks a lot like my 14763-61...
    image.jpg
     
    Giff2577 and Tiny Iota like this.
  6. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Apr 24, 2015

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
  7. Hijak Apr 24, 2015

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    Yes I saw that. But the case, hands, dial (bar the font), even the crown, look identical.
     
  8. ulackfocus Apr 24, 2015

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    Omega switched from 5 digit reference numbers to 6 digit reference numbers around 1962. Many case styles continued under the new reference numbers, and I think (not 100% positive) that this is the case (pun intended! :p) with the 14.7xx and 166.0xx. I forget exactly which reference replaced what, but it's along those lines.

    It just so happened that in this same time, Omega phased out the coat hanger S in favor of the more rounded curving S.
     
    Samir and Giff2577 like this.
  9. ulackfocus Apr 24, 2015

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
  10. Hijak Apr 24, 2015

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    Would be curious to see the inside case back and movement on this one. Bet it has a 562 inside...
     
  11. ulackfocus Apr 24, 2015

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    Do you mean the watch the OP is asking about? I'd bet on that too.
     
  12. proximal Apr 24, 2015

    Posts
    287
    Likes
    455
    Thanks, guys. I'll ask if he's interested in opening it up himself and loan him my wrench and opening ball.
     
  13. Hijak Apr 24, 2015

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    Yes.