correct lume aging on dial and hands -

Posts
183
Likes
15
Question concernes Submariners and GMT 1960-79 , what are the signs to watch out for . Ebay sells artificially aged Rolex hands. Often the hands seem a touch lighter than the dial markers, this seems to be a reliable sign ? Other watches have a great even patina , which looks too perfect . Please share your wise thoughts

Some links to illustrate:

https://www.chrono24.fr/rolex/rolex-submariner--id42374826.htm
vs
https://www.chrono24.fr/rolex/rolex-submariner-date--id42054204.htm

Thank you very much
Alexanader ( Rolex virgin)
 
Posts
2,054
Likes
15,008
The second one has service hands (and insert), as stated in the Chrono24 listing "the watch was serviced by Rolex in 2020 at which point the hands were replaced and the bracelet is also a later service replacement.".

First one is ok, also a quite nice example.

In 4 digits reference hands usually matches indexes, in 5 digits you may find lighter hands as Rolex in the 90's had different suppliers for hands and dials; I would say lighter hands in 70% of the cases in 5 digits.
 
Posts
23,022
Likes
51,468
I will just add that there is sometimes too much emphasis put on what is "normal" when you should really be focused on what is attractive. I don't find dramatically mismatched lume to be terribly appealing, even if it is due to different suppliers, uneven aging, etc.

If you are trying to determine whether hands and dial are original to each other, it is helpful to study the properties of lume used in different eras, including the response to UV excitation and the fine surface texture of the lume.
 
Posts
183
Likes
15
very helpful contributions , thank you Mr Kaplan and Dan S. I believe that there is such thing as an objective reference in how the dial should be. Since it is , for me, a work of art , I treat it as I used to treat the analysis of paintings. If things are restored/ added/ altered - it is not an original and thus inferior in quality. Dan you mention the different lume properties - if there is a book / PDF on that I would be grateful. Greeting from Paris. God bless Rolex.
 
Posts
23,022
Likes
51,468
very helpful contributions , thank you Mr Kaplan and Dan S. I believe that there is such thing as an objective reference in how the dial should be. Since it is , for me, a work of art , I treat it as I used to treat the analysis of paintings. If things are restored/ added/ altered - it is not an original and thus inferior in quality. Dan you mention the different lume properties - if there is a book / PDF on that I would be grateful. Greeting from Paris. God bless Rolex.
I recommend first hand experience handling watches, and inspecting them with a loupe and UV lamp from all angles and in different lighting, as opposed to a book. Pictures and descriptions will never substitute. If you really want to learn, you need to figure out how to get your hands on actual watches. Posting questions to the forum will not get you very far.
 
Posts
183
Likes
15
The second one has service hands (and insert), as stated in the Chrono24 listing "the watch was serviced by Rolex in 2020 at which point the hands were replaced and the bracelet is also a later service replacement.".
I recommend first hand experience handling watches, and inspecting them with a loupe and UV lamp from all angles and in different lighting, as opposed to a book. Pictures and descriptions will never substitute. If you really want to learn, you need to figure out how to get your hands on actual watches. Posting questions to the forum will not get you very far.





First one is ok, also a quite nice example.

In 4 digits reference hands usually matches indexes, in 5 digits you may find lighter hands as Rolex in the 90's had different suppliers for hands and dials; I would say lighter hands in 70% of the cases in 5 dig
I recommend first hand experience handling watches, and inspecting them with a loupe and UV lamp from all angles and in different lighting, as opposed to a book. Pictures and descriptions will never substitute. If you really want to learn, you need to figure out how to get your hands on actual watches. Posting questions to the forum will not get you very far.
Of course , but this is an ideal. And the the use of the forums is exactly that; places of exchange and learning. As many here, we are busy with our jobs and lives and are not handling Rolex Submariners for a living. Books and catalogues raisonée are the tools used to sell / estimate works of art , so it can work for watches too.
 
Posts
2,784
Likes
5,853
You need a UV-light with ca. 365 (360) nm wave-lenght. Others will not work (but are often sold).
 
Posts
12,841
Likes
22,166
Dan’s right though. If obviously more expensive in terms of time and money but the single best way to learn about a given reference is to handle them. I like buying watches so I usually do this by buying and selling several over a period of months.

I did this with 5 digit subs 12-24 months ago and ended up buying and selling about 6 before I landed on one I liked.
 
Posts
12,841
Likes
22,166
Good luck with getting your research served to you on a plate
 
Posts
23,022
Likes
51,468
Good luck with getting your research served to you on a plate
If you look back over the many threads he has started, you’ll see he is not getting very far with his virtual approach.
 
Posts
2,784
Likes
5,853
He is unwilling to accept advice and does not appreciate "thank you" when someone gives practical advice (like me). He takes HIS own path.
 
Posts
183
Likes
15
We are here to debate watches - to agree, to differ and to respectfully disagree. If I have insulted a member I kindly ask him to send me a PM and I shall apologise to him directly rather than use the forum as an arena for public humiliation. We all come from different socio - economic, ethnic and religious backgrounds. It is dangerous to jump to conclusions, to slander other members -Pogrom style- without any knowledge of what collecting means to them.

It's a privilege to discuss watch related matters with you. Please desist from any other comments.

Thank you for your understanding.

Alexander Sokolov - von Rozen
 
Posts
13,433
Likes
52,868
just to put a fine point on it. Mr Kaplan is a Rolex expert, does handle a lot of watches and I’d take his response to your query as definitive.
 
Posts
23,022
Likes
51,468
just to put a fine point on it. Mr Kaplan is a Rolex expert, does handle a lot of watches and I’d take his response to your query as definitive.
I agree with this. But saying that 70% of 5-digit references have lighter hands doesn't really help you determine whether a particular example has original hands. I'm certain that when @mr.kaplan inspects a Rolex in-person with a loupe, he learns a great deal from the specific color and texture and UV-response of hands and dial.

I truly believe that the OP will never make progress without handling watches in-person. He claims that art experts use books to develop their expertise, but personally I doubt it. If he doesn't want to buy a watch, there are various other ways to accomplish this, including networking with other enthusiasts in-person, finding a mentor, visiting dealers and retail store-fronts, etc. He is falsely characterizing suggestions/advice from me, @Davidt, and others as attacks, playing the victim card. What I am seeing is a common theme on OF, where members eventually become frustrated by repeated requests for spoon-feeding from a member who is unwilling to make a real effort to learn. I have been following the OP's repeated threads for almost a year now, where he continues to ask the same vague and naive questions about various Rolex references. He claims to have experience in the art auction world, so it strains credulity to believe that these questions are sincere. The same questions have been asked and answered dozens of times on this forum and others, and the vintage Rolex models he is referencing have dedicated reference websites that he can study if he is interested. Two minutes of googling will identify these sites.
Edited:
 
Posts
13,433
Likes
52,868
I agree with this. But saying that 70% of 5-digit references have lighter hands doesn't really help you determine whether a particular example has original hands. I'm certain that when @mr.kaplan inspects a Rolex in-person with a loupe, he learns a great deal from the specific color and texture and UV-response of hands and dial.

I truly believe that the OP will never make progress without handling watches in-person. He claims that art experts use books to develop their expertise, but personally I doubt it. If he doesn't want to buy a watch, there are various other ways to accomplish this, including networking with other enthusiasts in-person, finding a mentor, visiting dealers and retail store-fronts, etc. He is falsely characterizing suggestions/advice from me, @Davidt, and others as attacks, playing the victim card. What I am seeing is a common theme on OF, where members eventually become frustrated by repeated requests for spoon-feeding from a member who is unwilling to make a real effort to learn. I have been following the OP's repeated threads for almost a year now, where he continues to ask the same vague and naive questions about various Rolex references. He claims to have experience in the art auction world, so it strains credulity to believe that these questions are sincere. The same questions have been asked and answered dozens of times on this forum and others, and the vintage Rolex models he is referencing have dedicated reference websites that he can study if he is interested. Two minutes of googling will identify these sites.
Point taken. I’ve not followed the OP but I certainly have seen the behavior here on OF. I’m a relatively new member of a well known international audio forum and am always amazed at some of the posts asking for technical help that turn into attacks on those who dare to offer advice.
Edited:
 
Posts
183
Likes
15
I agree with this. But saying that 70% of 5-digit references have lighter hands doesn't really help you determine whether a particular example has original hands. I'm certain that when @mr.kaplan inspects a Rolex in-person with a loupe, he learns a great deal from the specific color and texture and UV-response of hands and dial.

I truly believe that the OP will never make progress without handling watches in-person. He claims that art experts use books to develop their expertise, but personally I doubt it. If he doesn't want to buy a watch, there are various other ways to accomplish this, including networking with other enthusiasts in-person, finding a mentor, visiting dealers and retail store-fronts, etc. He is falsely characterizing suggestions/advice from me, @Davidt, and others as attacks, playing the victim card. What I am seeing is a common theme on OF, where members eventually become frustrated by repeated requests for spoon-feeding from a member who is unwilling to make a real effort to learn. I have been following the OP's repeated threads for almost a year now, where he continues to ask the same vague and naive questions about various Rolex references. He claims to have experience in the art auction world, so it strains credulity to believe that these questions are sincere. The same questions have been asked and answered dozens of times on this forum and others, and the vintage Rolex models he is referencing have dedicated reference websites that he can study if he is interested. Two minutes of googling will identify these sites.
I do not characterise your advice as attacks , Dan. My acquisition of a 1978 SubMariner was based on your advice. Your remarks are extremely interesting and I have always thanked you. We all learn at our pace with the resources and constraints we have. Asking for mutual respect is not playing a victim's card. Let's forgive and turn the page.