Constellation year/model Identity?

Posts
25
Likes
3
I came across this Constellation for sale. The seller is unable to remove the back, which is a problem with me. So kinda going blind on this one. The seller lists it as a bumper movement. It appears to be in great shape. Any ideas for approximate year and reference this one might be?

 
Posts
3,323
Likes
12,939
Most of all, it’s a redial - which is why I‘d strongly recommend passing on it. There are further condition issues, but that’s not relevant anymore. Reference is 2782 by the way.
 
Posts
25
Likes
3
Most of all, it’s a redial - which is why I‘d strongly recommend passing on it. There are further condition issues, but that’s not relevant anymore. Reference is 2782 by the way.

That was my other concern that I slipped on mentioning. I'm doing my best to avoid redials. I appreciate that reminder!

I'm taking a pass on this one.
 
Posts
12,912
Likes
22,336
If you can’t identify that as a definite redial I’d suggest avoiding unknown private sellers for the time being. Either focus on the sales section here or do more reading before venturing out on your own.
 
Posts
25
Likes
3
If you can’t identify that as a definite redial I’d suggest avoiding unknown private sellers for the time being. Either focus on the sales section here or do more reading before venturing out on your own.
Thanks for the additional advice. I do lurk on the sales threads here.

I noticed the thicker, more sloppy lettering, as well as the 6 and star are off-centered. Those are the two that stood out most to me.

As mentioned, I simply forgot to mention it in my OP. I hadn't had my coffee yet. 😉

I was really most curious about the year/reference number that you were able to identify for me. But with your reminder of my redial concern, it's a hard pass.
 
Posts
6,317
Likes
9,909
It does not pass the MOY test, which is an easy give away
 
Posts
25
Likes
3
It does not pass the MOY test, which is an easy give away
What's the MOY test?? This is the first time I've seen this.
 
Posts
12,912
Likes
22,336
When I think of spotting redials, it always reminds me our two boarder collie sheepdogs, we had when I was growing up. Bear with me!

To me they looked so ridiculously different I couldn’t understand how my friends couldn’t tel them apart. “Which one is that?” I’d hear every time mates came over. As I saw them every day I knew every little detail, who was slightly larger, thicker fur, slimmer nose etc. to my mates they were two black and white dogs.

It’s similar with redials (imo). When you look at them frequently, 95% are obvious from a cursory glance. Because we know the exact thickness of the font, the serifs, the length of the minute markers etc. but, from a less experienced perspective, I get (and I can recall when I was starting out) how it’s really hard to tell when you don’t yet have your eye in. Yes reading articles is invaluable but for me, you need to look at tens or hundreds of known original dials so you understand what they should look like. Then over time, redials jump out like a fluffy sheepdog.
 
Posts
23,351
Likes
51,973
With experience, you will recognize the obvious printing errors, but this one can be identified as repainted just because of the sloppiness, e.g. with the minute markers. The cross hairs are totally misaligned with the minute markers. The minute markers are also misaligned with the outer gilt circle if you follow them around ... sometimes inside, sometimes crossing over. And the tick marks themselves are too sloppy.