Forums Latest Members
  1. Mrm1974 Aug 19, 2018

    Posts
    62
    Likes
    33
    Looking at this connie, noticed some inconsistencies, specially the font. Wanna hear your thoughts...
     
    Screenshot_20180819-162533.jpg Screenshot_20180819-162541.jpg Screenshot_20180819-162522.jpg Screenshot_20180819-162515.jpg Screenshot_20180819-162504.jpg
  2. Noddyman Aug 19, 2018

    Posts
    1,116
    Likes
    1,774
    It’s not just the fonts, look at those minute markers .... quality!!
    Run and don’t look back.
     
    Mrm1974 likes this.
  3. MikeMan2727 Aug 19, 2018

    Posts
    1,654
    Likes
    8,682
    That is definitely a refinished dial. The font in Constellation is pretty bad. It also looks like the hour markers at 12 and 6 are peeling up and casting a shadow onto the dial. Crown is wrong too.

    Here is a correct 2852 that I had:

    20180626_133141.jpg
     
  4. rkman11 Aug 19, 2018

    Posts
    1,687
    Likes
    5,644
    Run don’t walk!
     
    Mrm1974 likes this.
  5. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 19, 2018

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,791
    Bad
     
  6. TexOmega Aug 19, 2018

    Posts
    7,318
    Likes
    54,419
    I can't un-see that::facepalm1::
     
  7. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Aug 19, 2018

    Posts
    12,620
    Likes
    29,918
    I think it qualifies as really bad.
     
    Dan S likes this.
  8. Sherbie Aug 19, 2018

    Posts
    1,323
    Likes
    1,860
    505 were not used in that reference or in SS ( according to Desmomds ref list of constellation calibers)

    Absolute MUNTER