[Constellation] Opinion on 2 MOY failures - I believe one genuine, one re-dial

Posts
2,608
Likes
3,045
First one is a MEISTER dial that seems to fail, but from lume pips etc. - it should be authentic I assume
Second one is a meteor dial, I think it's a re-dial

 
Posts
494
Likes
732
Those C-case have something special... the MOY test does not works everytime! There are many dial variation.

hard to tell from pictures you provide, but both of them may be original to me
 
Posts
34
Likes
19
The Meteor Dial is neat, but I am a sucker for anything space related 馃榾
 
Posts
6,082
Likes
9,418
The Meteor Dial is neat, but I am a sucker for anything space related 馃榾

I think they are correctly called 'silky guilloche' dials but more commonly known as 'linen' dials in these parts.

Lovely, but not very space related I'm afraid.
 
Posts
34
Likes
19
Ah darn - but hey now I know what it's called so thank you! I will keep an eye open for one.
 
Posts
2,608
Likes
3,045
The second watch has 2 deeply curved n's on Constellation, usually the first n is slightly curved, second n is deeply curved

AUTOMATIC is more like A U TOMATIC

So the second one seems fishy to me
 
Posts
2,608
Likes
3,045
Those C-case have something special... the MOY test does not works everytime! There are many dial variation.

hard to tell from pictures you provide, but both of them may be original to me

What's special about the second one by the way, does it have a rarity that I didn't notice?
 
Posts
6,082
Likes
9,418
What's special about the second one by the way, does it have a rarity that I didn't notice?

@Gui13250 means that C cases are special, in that they have many more variations than any other Connie.

whilst I agree that the 'automatic' looks oddly spaced, if you move the red line to the right slightly it would bisect the Omega symbol, the first part of the M, the O and the star and miss the 'e'
it still fails the MOY test but this is common on C cases.

better pics would help in assessing the dial

 
Posts
2,120
Likes
1,307
Second looks like someone touched or redid the luminous. Looks sloppy compared to the first

DON