Forums Latest Members
  1. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Nov 15, 2015

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    7,886
    I saw this effort on Ebay and it got me to thinking

    I seem to recall that Desmond's site shows that there is evidence to suggest that some 562s may have been chronometer rated and used in Connies
    -but that there was some doubt

    Do any of our myriad of Connies collectors have a Connie with a chronometer rated 562?
    (if there is such a thing -it must surely be found on OF)
    -and one they are willing to put up for scrutiny of course....

    here is one which has no 'adjusted' text and therefore should be in no doubt -would have been a nice Seamaster movement once upon a time -but surely not for a Constellation
    (unless you know better...)

    $1249 -Zurich

    nice visage but seriously dodgy innards
    please feel free to comment / dissect at will Screen Shot 2015-11-15 at 13.34.34.png
    Screen Shot 2015-11-15 at 13.35.17.png
    Screen Shot 2015-11-15 at 13.35.29.png

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/OMEGA-Const...727937?hash=item1c5a19da01:g:oEQAAOSwsB9WBnrwPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network
     
    Civilguy007 likes this.
  2. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Nov 15, 2015

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,686
    Yeah, besides the lacking adjustement text, the gold plating looks inconsistent.
     
  3. al128 unsolicited co-moderation giverer Nov 15, 2015

    Posts
    2,203
    Likes
    2,017
    inconsistent ... as in "cooked up in a meth-lab in rural AZ" ;-)
     
  4. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Nov 15, 2015

    Posts
    12,203
    Likes
    15,717
    You are correct. However, I have yet to see Omega confirm one as genuine. Bear in mind that Omega is extremely reluctant to say anything in recent years regarding authenticity on any watch.

    IMO, given the ease that a cal. 562 could be substituted for a cal 561 by a collector, I would be skeptical of any such piece.

    Hope this helps,
    gatorcpa
     
  5. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Nov 15, 2015

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,686
    Albuquerque ;)
     
  6. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Nov 16, 2015

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    7,886
    So no-one has a 562 (Connie) to show?
     
    Edited Nov 16, 2015
  7. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Nov 16, 2015

    Posts
    12,203
    Likes
    15,717
    Frankly, I think they are like unicorns.

    Mythical.
    gatorcpa
     
    Peemacgee likes this.
  8. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 16, 2015

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    You forget about the secret work on miniature horses being carried out by Dennis at the Omega Fischenthal laboratories.....
    squirrel-on-unicorn1.jpg
     
    McKinley, Tritium, gatorcpa and 5 others like this.
  9. Shabbaz Nov 27, 2017

    Posts
    4,900
    Likes
    17,865
    What do you think of this one? It should be a cal 561 for a 168.004 but according to some info on the web the 562 was also used for the constellation. Is the watch legit?
     
    Screenshot_20171127-231501.png Screenshot_20171127-231517.png Screenshot_20171127-231920.png Screenshot_20171127-231608.png Screenshot_20171127-234755.png
  10. Shabbaz Nov 27, 2017

    Posts
    4,900
    Likes
    17,865
    Info from desmond about the 562:
     
    Screenshot_20171127-233414.jpg
  11. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Nov 27, 2017

    Posts
    12,619
    Likes
    29,915
    Wrong movement, should be cal 561, this 562 does not appear to have an adjusted bridge, making it highly suspect.
     
    Peemacgee likes this.
  12. Shabbaz Nov 27, 2017

    Posts
    4,900
    Likes
    17,865
    I agree...:)
     
    Screenshot_20171128-000122.png
  13. 1jansen Nov 27, 2017

    Posts
    324
    Likes
    634
    Even if
    Copied above respectful members' and Desmond's comments.
    Even if the upper bridge for automatic device is a 5 positions adjusted one (with additional jewels on it as well), it is also doubtful. Though they are of different part no., they are interchangeable. (see below). A watchmaker can just change an adjusted bridge to a Cal.562 with little effort. A Cal.562 with an adjusted bridge, doesn't means it is legitimate unless endorsed by Omega authority, that is very unlikely.

    A non-conclusive summary is it is highly unlikely (or suspicious) a Constellation be powered by Cal.562. IMO
    Cheers,

    20171128_072124_B.jpg 20171128_072300_B.jpg
     
  14. 1jansen Nov 27, 2017

    Posts
    324
    Likes
    634
    EDIT: ....additional jewels are not on the adjusted bridge. It is inside the automatic rotor mechanism underneath it.
     
  15. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Nov 28, 2017

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    7,886
    Based on the fact that we (almost certainly) have the greatest combined collection of Connies on the planet in this forum and I posted my original thread two years ago - and no-one offered up a genuine 562 Connie....
    So I think it’s fair to say that if they do exist they are few and far between.
    So any 562 Connie that comes up for sale claiming to be correct should be treated with a health dose of skepticism.
    And if it were a correct later Connie it should have adjusted 5 positions on the bridge or it wouldn’t be chronometer rated.
     
    1jansen and BenBagbag like this.
  16. Shabbaz Nov 28, 2017

    Posts
    4,900
    Likes
    17,865
     
    Screenshot_20171128-164803.jpg
  17. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Nov 28, 2017

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    7,886
    I think we’ve all read Desmond’s blog but in 2 years still no-one has presented what they believe to be a genuine 562 Connie.
    But there always hope....if there’s one out there it will surely make it way to OF eventually.
     
  18. Ocean Sep 18, 2019

    Posts
    275
    Likes
    216
    Hi

    I read this forum for a long time but I never participate active at a discussion but this time i think it is necessary..:).
    So I found this Constellation watch and I was wondering if it is a genuine watch, a franken watch, a rare watch as the discussion above or just a regular one..:)
    what intrigue me was the fact that the case ref 166.002 on google match only seamaster models and this watch for my eyes it is a constellation watch 100% authentic..

    Thank you for your help..here are the pictures and if more need it just tell.

    DSC_1590.JPG DSC_1591.JPG DSC_1592.JPG DSC_1593.JPG DSC_1594.JPG DSC_1595.JPG DSC_1596.JPG DSC_1597.JPG
     
  19. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Sep 18, 2019

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    7,886
    Welcome @Ocean
    I hope you didn’t pay too much for the watch -and/or can return it.
    The case and dial look to be fake and the movt (if original) is a bit of a mess.

    BTW The correct case style would be a 168.005
     
    chronos likes this.
  20. Ocean Sep 18, 2019

    Posts
    275
    Likes
    216
    Thank you for your reply..

    A disappointing news for me but please give me more details. First how can I spot that the dial it is fake. I seen many Omega dials good and fakes..(maybe I did not seen good fakes :) ) and I do not spot anything wrong here..Applied logo, good font, centred.. And the case back ..how do they fake it? they applied gold constellation logo over a seahorse?..and why to do that? I payed about 500 Euro and can not return it..:)

    I will appreciate more details at least to learn something.
    Thank you!