maumerstrubbi
·I am a proud owner of a „first series“ constellation manhattan from the mid 80s and I am seriously wondering why it is so underapreciated and undervalued by the collectors community.
It has such sweet dimensions with its moderate width of 35mm and its slim and low profile on the wrist. And with the bracelet wears so nice and you almost don’t feel it and realise it’s an ss-bracelet. It’s genuinely the most comfortable watch bracelet in my eyes apart from watches on a leather strap. It’s more comfortable than a bor and it just doesn’t wears out and doesn’t really loosen.
And this watch is so much more raw than the constellation models nowadays - it’s just a little edgier with that flat and not rounded bezel like on the models starting in the mid 90s. That way it appears with a lot mor filigree on the wrist in my eyes.
I am genuinely wondering why this early constellations aren’t thought after at all around here. I mean it enabled me to get mine for a couple hundred € but still I am fan of it and genuinely want to discuss why so few people are fans of this early reference manhattan.
Is it because of this simple ETA non inhouse movement? Is it because it’s from the 80s and there for in many eyes not really a vintage piece. Although I would argue it is compared to the evolution of the manhattan since then.
Or is it just a little to unusual for omega and its other vintage stuff?
Anyways I will add some pics of my piece for further discussions on this topic. 😎😉
And yes I really like the patina the dial has gotten over time. 🤗
And if no one wants to discuss this topic - may be it can be an appreciation post for all the „first series“ manhattan owners that really like this constellation reference from the 80s 😇
It has such sweet dimensions with its moderate width of 35mm and its slim and low profile on the wrist. And with the bracelet wears so nice and you almost don’t feel it and realise it’s an ss-bracelet. It’s genuinely the most comfortable watch bracelet in my eyes apart from watches on a leather strap. It’s more comfortable than a bor and it just doesn’t wears out and doesn’t really loosen.
And this watch is so much more raw than the constellation models nowadays - it’s just a little edgier with that flat and not rounded bezel like on the models starting in the mid 90s. That way it appears with a lot mor filigree on the wrist in my eyes.
I am genuinely wondering why this early constellations aren’t thought after at all around here. I mean it enabled me to get mine for a couple hundred € but still I am fan of it and genuinely want to discuss why so few people are fans of this early reference manhattan.
Is it because of this simple ETA non inhouse movement? Is it because it’s from the 80s and there for in many eyes not really a vintage piece. Although I would argue it is compared to the evolution of the manhattan since then.
Or is it just a little to unusual for omega and its other vintage stuff?
Anyways I will add some pics of my piece for further discussions on this topic. 😎😉
And yes I really like the patina the dial has gotten over time. 🤗
And if no one wants to discuss this topic - may be it can be an appreciation post for all the „first series“ manhattan owners that really like this constellation reference from the 80s 😇
