dhdennislee
·Hi everyone,
I’m considering purchasing this Omega Constellation Ref. 168.005 (Cal.561) and would really appreciate a second opinion on its originality and overall condition before committing.
According to the seller:
I’ve attached photos of the dial (straight-on and angled), case profile, caseback (inside and outside), and movement with the visible serial number.
I’d especially appreciate your thoughts on the
following:
Overall, does anything stand out as inconsistent or incorrect for this reference?
Many thanks in advance for your time and expertise!
I’m considering purchasing this Omega Constellation Ref. 168.005 (Cal.561) and would really appreciate a second opinion on its originality and overall condition before committing.
According to the seller:
- Reference: 168.005
- Production year: 1964
- Movement: Cal.561 (24 jewels)
- Gold-capped case (gold bezel over stainless steel)
- Professionally serviced in 2024
- Running at approximately -2 seconds/day
- Original acrylic crystal (with expected surface scratches)
- Aftermarket burgundy leather strap
I’ve attached photos of the dial (straight-on and angled), case profile, caseback (inside and outside), and movement with the visible serial number.
I’d especially appreciate your thoughts on the
following:
- Does the dial appear original, or do you see any signs of refinishing or restoration (fonts, printing, logo, minute track, etc.)?
- The dial has some small spots visible under certain lighting. Does this look like normal age-related patina, moisture damage, or something else?
- Do the hands, crown, and date window/frame look correct for a 168.005?
- Does the case appear to have been heavily polished, or are the lugs and bezel still reasonably sharp?
- Does anything about the movement, serial number, or caseback markings raise any concerns?
Overall, does anything stand out as inconsistent or incorrect for this reference?
Many thanks in advance for your time and expertise!









