Considering a Grand Seiko SBGM221 - thoughts from long term

Posts
11
Likes
66
I’m considering adding a SBGM221 to my collection.

For me, the appeal is that it feels like one of GS genuinely iconic designs: the warm ivory dial, the excellent case and hands finishing, and the crisp contrast of its blued GMT hand.

I also like that it has its own GMT language, without falling in the usual Rolex bezel template.

My main hesitation, though, is the 13.7mm thickness, particularly on my 15.5cm wrist. While the lug-to-lug seems manageable, I’m concerned it may sit too tall and feel top-heavy over time. Also, the thickness seems particularly unwarranted, given the splash resistant case.

I’d very interested in hearing long-term ownership experience. Thanks!!
 
Posts
8,941
Likes
74,490
I have two points.

First, I also have skinny wrists and I try not to get any watch thicker than 12mm, although I should say I prefer 35/37mm watches. I recently had a fancy for a Citizen NB1050-59L but held back until I could try one on and it was way too thick and heavy for me.

Second, I could have bought a new one for £250-320 but held back. I certainly wouldn’t spend the £3000 plus for a SBGM221 without trying it on.
 
Posts
165
Likes
387
16.5 cm here. I tried this watch in person. Too thick and too big lug-to-lug for my taste. Not heavy tho.
I have thicker watches and they work for me, eg. PO.
I strongly suggest to try it in person before buying.
 
Posts
1,072
Likes
8,160
I really love the look and finish of this watch, however, after 3 years of ownership, I recently sold mine, I just stopped wearing it. It does wear high on the wrist and I found the GMT dial too busy. I think the SBGW 231 would have suited me better.
 
Posts
11
Likes
66
Thanks for the replies! I think this confirms my suspicions.

As appealing as the SBGM221 is in terms of dial and identity, I think the thickness would be simply too much for me.

The case proportions do feel incongruous with the elegant character that otherwise this watch is trying to convey.