Forums Latest Members
  1. nanjingcigaretes practicing PMA Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    1,310
    Likes
    1,326
    Hi Omega Friends,
    This one just poped up to me, I am about to pull the trigger but want to seeking for your opinion first.
    This is a Connie 2852 with cal 505, serial 15mils
    What I am concern is about the dial originality ( seller claimed it is)
    It looks perfect under my untrained eyes, but the fact that the dial is in such a good condition kinda scare me a bit. I owned 1 like this b4, but this dial is another level compare to mine.
    So seeking for your thoughts, thank you OF.
    Apologize for my bad english.
    Stephen
     
    47D1AEBA-9A27-4086-9E40-5B9402E18C20.jpeg
  2. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    12,206
    Likes
    15,723
    I can’t tell if the dial is original because the picture is out of focus. The only way to tell on some of these is to see it in person.

    The crown is from a Seamaster, but you may be able to replace it with a correct 10-sided version.

    Good luck,
    gatorcpa
     
    Noddyman and nanjingcigaretes like this.
  3. nanjingcigaretes practicing PMA Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    1,310
    Likes
    1,326
    Yes my previous actually has 10 facet crown. Here are some more photos from the seller.
     
    DF32A944-DAF8-409D-AEBB-D907714C1419.jpeg 3BDFAE7A-CB82-4C32-8FC7-12619AA53336.jpeg
  4. Passover Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    1,854
    Likes
    2,528
    Dial looks legit IMO:

    MOY as expected for that reference, different Ms in "Automatic" and "Chronometer", Star, crosshair I can't see any red flags...
     
    Dan S likes this.
  5. Noddyman Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    1,116
    Likes
    1,774
    I am with @gatorcpa on this one. Nothing immediately stands out but the dial is almost too clean for my liking. I would want clearer pics or better still see in person if possible.
     
  6. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    12,206
    Likes
    15,723
    Second set of pictures are better. The fonts and placement of printing look correct.

    The surface of the dial seems to be somewhat granular.

    66F19C52-CC8F-49CB-9859-EE824408976E.jpeg

    It could be that someone cleaned the dial and took off the original lacquer.

    This is a tough call.
    gatorcpa
     
    OMEGuy, Waltesefalcon and ConElPueblo like this.
  7. ConElPueblo Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    There are some bubbling on the dial too. IMO definitely a cleaned dial.
     
    nanjingcigaretes likes this.
  8. Gui13250 Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    452
    Likes
    705
    CC5B84C2-0721-4986-BAFE-CAD60F464D29.png Looking at the kind of « brush » between arrows markers, would say at least heavily cleaned... would need better pictures of the font
     
    Waltesefalcon likes this.
  9. KingCrouchy Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    1,502
    Likes
    5,665
    The dial looks cleaned to me, but would need better Pictures of the dial to be 100% sure.
     
  10. nanjingcigaretes practicing PMA Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    1,310
    Likes
    1,326
    So a cleaned dial is consider original or redial, would it effect the collectinf value of the watch?
     
  11. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Mar 27, 2020

    Posts
    12,206
    Likes
    15,723
    If that is all, then it is considered an original dial, but cleaned.

    To most collectors, not the same as truly original and should be priced less.

    Hope this helps,
    gatorcpa
     
    Dr No likes this.
  12. new_heuer Mar 28, 2020

    Posts
    432
    Likes
    313
    The bent top left lug would be enough for me to walk away even if the dial is original
     
  13. harrymai86 Mar 28, 2020

    Posts
    1,254
    Likes
    2,709
    Case looks quite soft. I saw it on facebook and it was sold to someone quite fast, maybe it has some problems but price was quite good