Can someone help me decipher this tag?

Posts
9
Likes
5
I will post pictures of the watch once I get it back from the jewelers, but in the interim I have this tag. I know it’s a 1956 seamaster automatic but the rest is greek to me. Ran across this watch in belongings of my grandfather’s that were given to me.
 
Posts
8,116
Likes
28,621
Photos of the actual watch are required for any serious analyses.
 
Posts
24,393
Likes
54,284
Why don't you just wait until you have something worthwhile to post, then post lots of good photos and all the information you have, so the experts can take a good look and give you answers. Otherwise, people may take a quick look at a picture of a tag and move on.
 
Posts
24,393
Likes
54,284
In the meantime, you can read this, which describes the stainless version of the watch corresponding to that tag (which would be gold-capped over stainless). The dial may not be exactly the same as the photo on the page, since there are many dial/hand variants for a given reference. Obviously, we can't say if the tag and watch even go together without seeing photos of the watch.
https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-seamaster-calendar-ck-2849
Edited:
 
Posts
9
Likes
5
In the meantime, you can read this, which describes the stainless version of the watch corresponding to that tag (which would be gold-capped over stainless). The dial may not be exactly the same as the photo on the page, since there are many dial/hand variants for a given reference. Obviously, we can't say if the tag and watch even go together without seeing photos of the watch.
https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-seamaster-calendar-ck-2849
The first line means "Center seconds"in French, 28mm movement. KO2849AP defines the watch, and is usually called the case number. The last is likely the serial number of the watch.

KO means gold capped.

Probably looks close to this, except in gold. https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-seamaster-calendar-ck-2849

Too late at night and I am loopy, now I see that Dan shared similar.
Thank you for helping me to decipher. I knew that pictures would be necessary to decode the watch a bit more—I was just trying to understand the tag a little better to be more self sufficient. Thanks for taking the time to reply
 
Posts
9
Likes
5
In the meantime, you can read this, which describes the stainless version of the watch corresponding to that tag (which would be gold-capped over stainless). The dial may not be exactly the same as the photo on the page, since there are many dial/hand variants for a given reference. Obviously, we can't say if the tag and watch even go together without seeing photos of the watch.
https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-seamaster-calendar-ck-2849
Thanks for taking the time to provide the link. I wasn’t trying to be dumb and clueless—I am actually a rather self sufficient human at most times. I can verify that it is an omega from just looking at it and reading the face. It’s possible that it’s not authentic….but I don’t think that is the case.
 
Posts
516
Likes
794
The 2849 is one of my favourite models! Mine says hi, also gold capped.
 
Posts
24,393
Likes
54,284
Thanks for taking the time to provide the link. I wasn’t trying to be dumb and clueless—I am actually a rather self sufficient human at most times. I can verify that it is an omega from just looking at it and reading the face. It’s possible that it’s not authentic….but I don’t think that is the case.

Apologies if you were offended, I wasn't making any comments on your competence or suggesting that the watch might be fake. We just can't say that the tag actually refers to that particular watch without photos. We see this type of thing all the time, where someone has an old watch and some old accessories/papers, and assumes they go together because they were found in the same place. Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't. But either way, photos of the watch, inside and out, will permit not only identification, but information about the originality of the watch's components, its condition, approximate value if you're interested, etc.
 
Posts
516
Likes
794
Apologies if you were offended, I wasn't making any comments on your competence or suggesting that the watch might be fake. We just can't say that the tag actually refers to that particular watch without photos. We see this type of thing all the time, where someone has an old watch and some old accessories/papers, and assumes they go together because they were found in the same place. Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't. But either way, photos of the watch, inside and out, will permit not only identification, but information about the originality of the watch's components, its condition, approximate value if you're interested, etc.

That's actually a good advice- ask your watchmaker to take pictures of the movement, the inside of the Caseback, etc.
 
Posts
9
Likes
5
Apologies if you were offended, I wasn't making any comments on your competence or suggesting that the watch might be fake. We just can't say that the tag actually refers to that particular watch without photos. We see this type of thing all the time, where someone has an old watch and some old accessories/papers, and assumes they go together because they were found in the same place. Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't. But either way, photos of the watch, inside and out, will permit not only identification, but information about the originality of the watch's components, its condition, approximate value if you're interested, etc.
Sorry if I came across defensive. Ironically I was trying not to be an airhead. I did request pictures of the interior from the individual tuning it and cleaning it up. I look forward to being able to post pictures