tapaptpat
路Yep made of copper and tin, two of the least magnetic metals 馃摉
I know I am pulling a fast one, but it's Pratchett. I just had to..
Mm thinking re @dialstaic experiment with the misses. Testing the watch later today will probably show that it contains a negative charge. The problem is not if outside of the case has a charge but if the inside is affected by it. I am refering to my first question does the watch contain a soft iron inner case?
Again this "gut science" and not empirical proof.
So let me refer to the thinking behind a "man is not lost". And the development of the standards that led to the mark 11 being designed. In short a watch that can operate in a highly magnetic environment.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&s...N2C1zg7KCPCQlIX2Q&sig2=oAt_b2UwCk7m4cT3H59ddw
Also It makes me think about Faraday cages. So to my understanding of this physical magnification it's charge is on the outside and the content is safe. Ie you get a shock when trying to get in the car. However lightning can strike the car and the occupants are safe. Though they might be a little shock up.
So is it sufficient to earth a magnified watch or is to late as the damage has already been done.
Again thanx for all comedy but science will prevail.
P
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
Edited:




