Calibre 321 - O-mega steel? Modern Omega Watches discussion

Posts
187
Likes
418
So I was chatting on Reddit this evening and a gentleman there mentioned that 321’s also utilise the proprietary O-Megasteel.

This was his comment on a thread about 321’s:


“It’s also the only Speedy that’s made from O-Megasteel, a fact Omega completely omits from its website.

I used to think that making a fuss about different types of steel was just marketing wank, but I bought a Constellation Observatory (also O-Megasteel, although the website boasts about it) and the steel really is different - it’s absolutely stunning, it’s almost as if it’s illuminated from the inside. I think it’s this that’s one of the key reasons the 321 is such a stunning watch.”


When I questioned: “Interesting. How do you know it’s “Omegasteel?” I have worn my 321 almost daily over three years or so, it seems to be holding up much better than expected.”

He replied:

“Omega boutique.

Having bought an Observatory, I was giving it a polish, mesmerised by how unusually beautiful the case steel was, so next time I went in I asked.

I said that an according to the website the only other watches made of O-Megasteel are the Planet Ocean Ultra Deep range; is that right or are there any others.

He said there is one - the 321, although they don’t mention it anywhere on the website.

Once you know this it makes sense, as it’s another subtle, almost subliminal, reason why the 321 looks so special.”

----------------------

What do you all think? From my perspective I’ve always felt the case and bracelet of my 321 are close to unblemished considering the degree of wear I’ve had with the watch. Hiking, camping, office to drinks and beyond with barely a mark.

The degree of finishing is beyond my other Omega watches, but so it should be, it’s a special watch.

Most other watches I bought around the same time and have worn less have not fared as well, so I thought it was an interesting point.



 
Posts
6,383
Likes
31,260
I don't think Omega made the 321 of O-mega steel without mentioning it and saved it as a usp for the PO UD.
 
Posts
187
Likes
418
I don't think Omega made the 321 of O-mega steel without mentioning it and saved it as a usp for the PO UD.
Exactly what I was thinking, whilst he seemed adamant in the discussion why would Omega omit the use of the steel in their advertising?

Using the steel in the observatory models alongside the Ultra Deep is also a strange choice.
 
Posts
83
Likes
51
So I was chatting on Reddit this evening and a gentleman there mentioned that 321’s also utilise the proprietary O-Megasteel.

This was his comment on a thread about 321’s:


“It’s also the only Speedy that’s made from O-Megasteel, a fact Omega completely omits from its website.

I used to think that making a fuss about different types of steel was just marketing wank, but I bought a Constellation Observatory (also O-Megasteel, although the website boasts about it) and the steel really is different - it’s absolutely stunning, it’s almost as if it’s illuminated from the inside. I think it’s this that’s one of the key reasons the 321 is such a stunning watch.”


When I questioned: “Interesting. How do you know it’s “Omegasteel?” I have worn my 321 almost daily over three years or so, it seems to be holding up much better than expected.”

He replied:

“Omega boutique.

Having bought an Observatory, I was giving it a polish, mesmerised by how unusually beautiful the case steel was, so next time I went in I asked.

I said that an according to the website the only other watches made of O-Megasteel are the Planet Ocean Ultra Deep range; is that right or are there any others.

He said there is one - the 321, although they don’t mention it anywhere on the website.

Once you know this it makes sense, as it’s another subtle, almost subliminal, reason why the 321 looks so special.”

----------------------

What do you all think? From my perspective I’ve always felt the case and bracelet of my 321 are close to unblemished considering the degree of wear I’ve had with the watch. Hiking, camping, office to drinks and beyond with barely a mark.

The degree of finishing is beyond my other Omega watches, but so it should be, it’s a special watch.

Most other watches I bought around the same time and have worn less have not fared as well, so I thought it was an interesting point.



The most incredible thing about this is that someone actually bought a Constellation Observatory! Why? Psychotic break? Drunk? On very strong meds? Blind? We should be told. Seriously though the Observatory is a terrible watch badly executed. Since it was launched my local Omega (corporate) boutique has sold - 0, none, not a sausage. The overall sales of the Observatory in the country have been below 20. So hearing someone bought one is shocking to say the least.
 
Posts
2,687
Likes
3,003
The most incredible thing about this is that someone actually bought a Constellation Observatory! Why? Psychotic break? Drunk? On very strong meds? Blind? We should be told. Seriously though the Observatory is a terrible watch badly executed. Since it was launched my local Omega (corporate) boutique has sold - 0, none, not a sausage. The overall sales of the Observatory in the country have been below 20. So hearing someone bought one is shocking to say the least.
I tried them on a few months back and thought they were actually pretty nice but just way overpriced.
 
Posts
7,758
Likes
14,340
The most incredible thing about this is that someone actually bought a Constellation Observatory! Why? Psychotic break? Drunk? On very strong meds? Blind? We should be told. Seriously though the Observatory is a terrible watch badly executed. Since it was launched my local Omega (corporate) boutique has sold - 0, none, not a sausage. The overall sales of the Observatory in the country have been below 20. So hearing someone bought one is shocking to say the least.
Why a "terrible watch badly executed"? The price is a bit high, but otherwise it's a pretty nice watch.

As far as O-MEGASTEEL being used on the 321, I doubt it. Omega would be crowing about it on a $17,300 steel watch if they were using it.
Edited:
 
Posts
187
Likes
418
The most incredible thing about this is that someone actually bought a Constellation Observatory! Why? Psychotic break? Drunk? On very strong meds? Blind? We should be told. Seriously though the Observatory is a terrible watch badly executed. Since it was launched my local Omega (corporate) boutique has sold - 0, none, not a sausage. The overall sales of the Observatory in the country have been below 20. So hearing someone bought one is shocking to say the least.
They are some wild stats. Twenty for the country? Why bother? It’s a super out there choice.
 
Posts
187
Likes
418
Why a "terrible watch badly executed"? The price is a bit high, but otherwise it's a pretty nice watch.

As far as O-MEGASTEEL being used on the 321, I doubt it. Omega would be crowing about it on a $17,300 steel watch if they were using it.
They rarely miss a marketing opportunity, not sure why they would miss this.
 
Posts
61
Likes
171
While I do find my 321 withstands daily wear noticeably better than my 3861s and other steel watches, the O-mega steel wasn't released until 2022 (PO Ultradeep) while EW was a 2020 release. I doubt OMEGA would change material in the middle of production.
 
Posts
187
Likes
418
While I do find my 321 withstands daily wear noticeably better than my 3861s and other steel watches, the O-mega steel wasn't released until 2022 (PO Ultradeep) while EW was a 2020 release. I doubt OMEGA would change material in the middle of production.
… or begin a model run with a new material without advertisement. Good point.