Posts
792
Likes
1,445
I think this question has come up a few times—if not here then on other forums—so perhaps it might be worth documenting my experience.

TLDR: Uncle Straps bracelets for the Speedmaster FOIS work well; Forstner bracelets for the FOIS do not work.

As a baseline, here is the OEM Omega bracelet:



The Forstner end links (in this case for the Flat Link Bracelet, do fit within the lugs without a gap, though their curvature isn't a great match for the Railmaster's lugs.



The problem with the Forstner bracelet is the first proper link. It's 20mm wide instead of 19mm. Since the Railmaster's lugs extend just a tiny bit past the end links, the bracelet link needs to fit between the lugs. It won't.



The Uncle Straps end links (in this case for the US1450 model) also fit the lugs without a gap. Their curvature, though not perfect, is a better match for the lugs than Forstners'.



Crucially, the Uncle Straps' proper links are 19mm rather than 20mm, so there is no problem fitting them to the watch.



I'm personally not a fan of Omega's OEM bracelet. The clasp is fiddly in the wrong way: it's too hard to close reliably, and it's too easy to open (e.g. inadvertently). The lack of micro adjustment also makes it difficult for me to maintain a comfortable fit for the entire day. Switching to the Uncle Straps US1450 has significantly increased my enjoyment of the watch.
 
Posts
1,259
Likes
1,265
Thanks for posting. I own the 36.2mm AT, which should be the same case. But the bracelet is one of my favorites of all time (once I replaced the clasp) so I've never been tempted to swap it for something different. I love the 19/16 taper.
 
Posts
792
Likes
1,445
once I replaced the clasp
Did you swap the OEM for a different (third party?) clasp, or do you mean that you simply acquired a new OEM clasp from Omega? I do like the OEM bracelet, but the clasp on mine is fiddly and flimsy.
 
Posts
1,259
Likes
1,265
The clasp to the Apollo 11 50th anniversary bracelet can be fitted to this bracelet. The only real downside is that connecting links to the clasp have a 10mm spacing and the AT bracelet has a 9.5mm spacing. So there is a gap of 0.5mm you can see. It doesn't bother me though because it's on the underside of my wrist 99% of the time.

Also, the Apollo 11 50th clasp only has 2 micro adjust spots. Better than the OEM AT bracelet, but I'd love to have one more. There's room to drill out a third hole though. I just need to find a jeweler or watchmaker who has the proper tools to do it. My regular watchmaker said he does not have the drill to it, but said most jewelers (that make jewelry) would commonly have the proper set up.

I will also say the connecting links to the clasp are 15mm wide and the AT links are 16mm wide. But in my eyes it looks normal since links taper smaller toward the clasp. And I fully brushed the connecting links to match the AT bracelet but left the clasp as is.

Edited:
 
Posts
2
Likes
0
I think this question has come up a few times—if not here then on other forums—so perhaps it might be worth documenting my experience.

TLDR: Uncle Straps bracelets for the Speedmaster FOIS work well; Forstner bracelets for the FOIS do not work.

As a baseline, here is the OEM Omega bracelet:



The Forstner end links (in this case for the Flat Link Bracelet, do fit within the lugs without a gap, though their curvature isn't a great match for the Railmaster's lugs.



The problem with the Forstner bracelet is the first proper link. It's 20mm wide instead of 19mm. Since the Railmaster's lugs extend just a tiny bit past the end links, the bracelet link needs to fit between the lugs. It won't.



The Uncle Straps end links (in this case for the US1450 model) also fit the lugs without a gap. Their curvature, though not perfect, is a better match for the lugs than Forstners'.



Crucially, the Uncle Straps' proper links are 19mm rather than 20mm, so there is no problem fitting them to the watch.



I'm personally not a fan of Omega's OEM bracelet. The clasp is fiddly in the wrong way: it's too hard to close reliably, and it's too easy to open (e.g. inadvertently). The lack of micro adjustment also makes it difficult for me to maintain a comfortable fit for the entire day. Switching to the Uncle Straps US1450 has significantly increased my enjoyment of the watch.
Which configurations of the US1450 did you get that works well with the 36mm case? I see it’s 20mm.

I’ve been searching forever for a way to add on the fly micro adjust to my first gen AT 36mm forever so this is very promising if you found one that fits great!!
 
Posts
792
Likes
1,445
Which configurations of the US1450 did you get that works well with the 36mm case? I see it’s 20mm.
The one linked in my post. It's 19mm.
 
Posts
2
Likes
0
Which configurations of the US1450 did you get that works well with the 36mm case? I see it’s 20mm.

I’ve been searching forever for a way to add on the fly micro adjust to my first gen AT 36mm forever so this is very promising if you found one that fits great!!
Ah I see the one with on the fly micro adjust is only available in 20mm.
The one linked in my post. It's 19mm.
Ah sorry, yes I see they have 19mm configurations now as well; but from the Uncle product descriptions it sounds like they just have pin-based micro-adjustments rather than on-the-fly -- is that correct or does yours have tool-less adjustments as well?
 
Posts
792
Likes
1,445
Ah I see the one with on the fly micro adjust is only available in 20mm.

Ah sorry, yes I see they have 19mm configurations now as well; but from the Uncle product descriptions it sounds like they just have pin-based micro-adjustments rather than on-the-fly -- is that correct or does yours have tool-less adjustments as well?
As far as I am aware, none of the Uncle Straps bracelets have tool-less micro adjustment, including the one linked in this comment and certainly the one I have on my Railmaster. They do sell a tool-less ratcheting diver's extension, but that won't work with this style of bracelet, or indeed any bracelet that tapers to 16mm.
 
Posts
1,259
Likes
1,265
Which configurations of the US1450 did you get that works well with the 36mm case? I see it’s 20mm.

I’ve been searching forever for a way to add on the fly micro adjust to my first gen AT 36mm forever so this is very promising if you found one that fits great!!
The solution found at post #68 in this thread will work with the 36.2 AT. If you go this route you will probably want to add some metal washers to take up the extra space on the connecting links because the bracelet middle link is 9.5mm wide and the clasp connecting links are 10.5mm wide.

https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/adjustable-clasp-conversion-compilation.5396509/

Also, if you choose this option I can post links for small washers that will take up the slack in the links.

It looks like what is posted below. These washers are 0.3mm wide. Using three of them I can fill 0.9mm of the 1.0mm space.

Edited:
 
Posts
4,011
Likes
8,675
The clasp to the Apollo 11 50th anniversary bracelet can be fitted to this bracelet. The only real downside is that connecting links to the clasp have a 10mm spacing and the AT bracelet has a 9.5mm spacing. So there is a gap of 0.5mm you can see. It doesn't bother me though because it's on the underside of my wrist 99% of the time.

Also, the Apollo 11 50th clasp only has 2 micro adjust spots. Better than the OEM AT bracelet, but I'd love to have one more. There's room to drill out a third hole though. I just need to find a jeweler or watchmaker who has the proper tools to do it. My regular watchmaker said he does not have the drill to it, but said most jewelers (that make jewelry) would commonly have the proper set up.

I will also say the connecting links to the clasp are 15mm wide and the AT links are 16mm wide. But in my eyes it looks normal since links taper smaller toward the clasp. And I fully brushed the connecting links to match the AT bracelet but left the clasp as is.


Can be fitted to the 1450? Ironic that this thread popped up today because I have an Apollo 11 50th bracelet sitting around and I was wondering if it fit on the 1450 bracelet.
 
Posts
1,259
Likes
1,265
Can be fitted to the 1450? Ironic that this thread popped up today because I have an Apollo 11 50th bracelet sitting around and I was wondering if it fit on the 1450 bracelet.
Are you talking about the 1450 made by Omega, Forstner, or Uncle Straps? I know the Heritage 300 bracelet with Heritage 300 connecting links will mate with a Forstner or US 1450 bracelet. I've never had an Omega 1450. The middle links on the Forstner and US are 10mm wide and the middle link on the Heritage 300 is 10.5mm so there will be a 0.5mm gap. That can either be left as is or filled with washers.

And I just got some new washers delivered today from AliExpress. I have them in 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5mm widths to mix and match to get the right gap fillers.

Here is the AliExpress link (for as long as it works). If the link stops working you want washers that are M1x2x0.2, M1x2x0.3, M1x2x0.3, M1x2x0.4, and/or M1x2x0.5. The last number is the width in mm.

https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256...st_main.4.32961802vD8rfY&gatewayAdapt=glo2usa


When I say middle link width, circled in red is what I mean.



Photo by the good people at Fratello.
Edited:
 
Posts
4,011
Likes
8,675
The clasp to the Apollo 11 50th anniversary bracelet can be fitted to this bracelet

Which bracelet does the Apollo 11 50th clasp fit to?

And edit: is it the second generation heritage clasp you're talking about?

Further: looks like you swapped the Apollo 11 50th class into an Aqua Terra bracelet? But if the measurement on the A11 is 10mm, I guess it would fit the 1450?
 
Posts
1,259
Likes
1,265
Which bracelet does the Apollo 11 50th clasp fit to?

And edit: is it the second generation heritage clasp you're talking about?

Further: looks like you swapped the Apollo 11 50th class into an Aqua Terra bracelet? But if the measurement on the A11 is 10mm, I guess it would fit the 1450?

Current gen Heritage 300 clasp is what I use.

The Apollo 11 50th clasp will connect with the 1450 from Forstner and US. Both have 10mm wide middle links. No spacers are needed. The Apollo 11 50th connecting links are 15mm total, and the Forstner and US bracelet links are 16mm total, which is fine because the look steps down toward the clasp.
 
Posts
4,011
Likes
8,675
Current gen Heritage 300 clasp is what I use.

The Apollo 11 50th clasp will connect with the 1450 from Forstner and US. Both have 10mm wide middle links. No spacers are needed. The Apollo 11 50th connecting links are 15mm total, and the Forstner and US bracelet links are 16mm total, which is fine because the look steps down toward the clasp.

Thank you for that info. Is there any difference at all in finishing quality or build quality between the two bracelets?
 
Posts
1,259
Likes
1,265
Thank you for that info. Is there any difference at all in finishing quality or build quality between the two bracelets?
The Apollo 11 50th clasp is a bit dainty. It seems more suited for a dressier watch like the AT. While it is well built, it seems a bit lightweight for the Speedmaster or Seamaster. It also only has two micro-adjustment holes. That said, there is more room in the clasp for a third and perhaps fourth hole. I've heard of people on the forums who have had their clasp drilled to add another hole. I have no idea why Omega would choose only 2 holes when there's more than enough room for third or even a fourth. More micro-adjustment choice is more better. 🙂

The Heritage 300 clasp has more presence and is well constructed. I really like it. And it has 3 micro-adjust holes with the press of a button. It doesn't get much better than that. I have two of these clasps and I use one on my AT and one on an SMP bracelet. If you're choosing between the two I would definitely choose this one for a Speedmaster or Seamaster.
 
Posts
4,011
Likes
8,675
at said, there is more room in the clasp for a third and perhaps fourth hole. I've heard of people on the forums who have had their clasp drilled to add another hole

Yep, I did this. I posted some pics of it a while back.
 
Posts
1,259
Likes
1,265
Yep, I did this. I posted some pics of it a while back.
I wanted to do this but my watchmaker said he didn't have the tooling for it. Which is surprising because he has a lot of high end gear as he's Swatch Group and LVMH trained and certified. He said a bench jeweler would be more set up to handle it but I don't do jewelry so I wouldn't know who to go to. I guess I could cold call some places but just haven't gotten around to it.