Blancpain history 1955-2023

Posts
6,126
Likes
11,375
Chez " Blancpain " they might have to edit their history book a bit 馃摉
.
Fifty Fathoms, The Dive and Watch History 1953-2013
.

 
Posts
428
Likes
795
And if you didn't read all the way to the end, you might have missed this little tidbit:

Oh, one more thing. Just as with vintage Omega Speedmasters, the Swatch Group has been rigging auctions for early Blancpain Fifty Fathoms as well. The prices achived at auction have to be taken with a grain of salt. If you found yourself in a bidding war over a Fifty Fathoms, chances are you were bidding against someone at Swatch Group who was using multiple accounts to make the watch appear more popular than it actually was.
 
Posts
1,039
Likes
507
En mi opini贸n, a perezcope le crecen los palmeros.

Rolex tampoco necesita palmeros. Esto 煤ltimo ya no es una opini贸n.
 
Posts
3,842
Likes
8,650
Holy crap! Not to throw this thread into the weeds, but I didn't know about watchlibrary.org. Talk about overwhelming....
 
Posts
2,555
Likes
5,604
To me, and I鈥檓 trying not to be biased as I鈥檓 an FF owner, the article does seem to draw cast-iron conclusions from a simple lack of evidence. It doesn鈥檛 seem as balanced and as objective as other articles and work by Jose.
 
Posts
2,555
Likes
5,604
And if you didn't read all the way to the end, you might have missed this little tidbit:
And this was odd to read. I follow FF results and prices are all over the place. I don鈥檛 see much point in rigging auctions unless you鈥檙e going to rig them all. Perhaps it鈥檚 beneficial to have stellar results from some of the bigger sales (say Philipps), but as a private buyer I would never use these as realistic reference points. It鈥檇 be helpful if Jose presented some evidence.
 
Posts
50
Likes
83
Holy crap! Not to throw this thread into the weeds, but I didn't know about watchlibrary.org. Talk about overwhelming....
+1 Simply amazing, I'm considering contributing because they deserve it
 
Posts
27,358
Likes
69,757
To me, and I鈥檓 trying not to be biased as I鈥檓 an FF owner, the article does seem to draw cast-iron conclusions from a simple lack of evidence. It doesn鈥檛 seem as balanced and as objective as other articles and work by Jose.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. That principle seems to be lost in this article...
 
Posts
1,039
Likes
507
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. That principle seems to be lost in this article...

Hey archer, the rolex fans will kill us 馃榿
 
Posts
41
Likes
81
Pretty interesting read. The author does seem certain of his own research into the family, however the fact that 100 years ago, the company claimed to have begun in 1815, makes me think that was correct. Obviously it would be interesting to see what was claimed, in say 1840.
Somehow made my post a quote, my bad.