Forums Latest Members
  1. ck1991 Feb 4, 2019

    Posts
    15
    Likes
    7
    hi all,

    Would like to get your opinions on the following which I am interested in getting. (Photos below)

    My own take is that the hands seem to be inconsistent with the dial. There isn’t lume on the hands but lume dots are present in the dial.

    Other than that, however, it seems like a pretty sweet black omega calendar.

    Please feel free to leave your comments.
     
    1B2905CC-6BA4-455C-B185-194A9F442EF1.png 44E32F27-A816-490E-8ED3-AD6D965CFFE1.png 87EC0826-0EC3-4D81-95C2-4DDF0E6B174A.png 90B205E6-E187-48AB-A58E-7661C37316C6.png 80942252-C0E0-4924-970D-10BF619D894C.png 6711A72E-65B2-46D0-B1B9-00BB09EC3B81.png 3140EA52-7B86-47DC-B329-E88D3AFD0E23.png 0A54658D-B40F-4D0B-A0EC-45C6E3471B67.png 9DDF5787-E2D1-4F99-B37F-166854BC86C0.png F72ABDF1-0936-4F72-BD35-1D5850CB331E.png 236ECE48-3817-45A0-9731-3FBB4D81F5FE.png
    Hamish02, bardamu, TexOmega and 4 others like this.
  2. ConElPueblo Feb 4, 2019

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    I'd say that you are right in your assesment. Beautiful watch!
     
  3. omegaswisst Feb 4, 2019

    Posts
    573
    Likes
    1,362
    Is the ''S" in Seamaster ok?

    Another 2849
    499090-5c5c7a9b30206f1ef159fa0008df12a6-2.jpg

    OP 2849
    2849 dial sunlight.jpg
     
  4. ChrisN Feb 4, 2019

    Posts
    2,218
    Likes
    4,756
    Looks a gorgeous watch.

    The first picture is mine posted on a Seamaster font thread. I looked at the watch which I sold and it is here. It's a -2 case with serial 14.9m but the OP has a -11 and serial 17.2m. I think this font is valid for the slightly later model and have seen it before.

    Cheers, Chris
     
    KP-99 likes this.
  5. omegaswisst Feb 4, 2019

    Posts
    573
    Likes
    1,362
    Thanks for that @ChrisN

    I tried to find another similar shaped S but the closest I saw was the one in your thread with the 16.8m serial. However the 'r' dropped below the the other letters.

    499087-9503d28d566b3a50cf677e30d742a263.jpg



    When I looked at another 17m serial number 2849-11 cal 503 I got this font, with the more pronounced coathanger S.

    20190204_222018.jpg
     
  6. ChrisN Feb 4, 2019

    Posts
    2,218
    Likes
    4,756
    These Seamaster fonts are a minefield. I agree that the S is slightly different but, it may just be an intended (or unintended) variation. All the rest of the text looks spot on to me and the OP fonts are taken through a crystal so, there might be some distortion? It is very hard with these to be sure but when you look as all the text, it must be original in my opinion.

    Cheers, Chris
     
    Noddyman, KP-99, Dr No and 3 others like this.
  7. omegaswisst Feb 4, 2019

    Posts
    573
    Likes
    1,362
    Just sold for $3301 AUD/ 2378 USD
     
  8. seekingseaquest Feb 4, 2019

    Posts
    2,338
    Likes
    6,176
    I was surprised by the price but these things are uncommon so who knows. Anyone here get it?
     
  9. cristos71 Feb 5, 2019

    Posts
    7,157
    Likes
    32,938
    I had been tracking it since it was listed, but my bid was blown out of the water and then some :(

    A very strong result, but then it's a very beautiful watch in excellent shape.
     
    sdre likes this.
  10. KP-99 Feb 5, 2019

    Posts
    231
    Likes
    2,222
    Perhaps, it could help to identify correct seamaster fonts, here is my 2848:

    [​IMG]

    Actually, the watch is at an Omega certified watchmaker for a service and correct golden hands.
     
    KingCrouchy likes this.
  11. omegaswisst Feb 5, 2019

    Posts
    573
    Likes
    1,362

    I've been putting together a series of pictures for the font of the Seamaster Calendar reference. Can you let me know the full case reference for your watch and year. Thanks.

    https://omegaforums.net/threads/seamaster-calendar-2849-font-variations.89338/
     
    Edited Feb 5, 2019
  12. KP-99 Feb 5, 2019

    Posts
    231
    Likes
    2,222
    Edited Feb 5, 2019
  13. omegaswisst Feb 5, 2019

    Posts
    573
    Likes
    1,362
    The Seamaster 2848 usually has a cal 490/491 inside, see link below.

    https://www.omegawatches.com/watch-omega-seamaster-omega-ck-2848

    If you look at the last digit of the case reference number on the inside of your caseback I think it could be a "9"
     
  14. Folgono Feb 5, 2019

    Posts
    337
    Likes
    534
    We were a lot to follow this one obviously. I was totally surprised by the price, I didn't even bid on it. :(
    Is it an usual price for this reference or a lot of bidders wanted it badly ?
     
    Edited Feb 5, 2019
  15. KP-99 Feb 6, 2019

    Posts
    231
    Likes
    2,222
    Unfortunately, the watch is actually not in my hands.
    I will look for the last number inside, when it has arrived back from service. ☝️
     
  16. KP-99 Feb 6, 2019

    Posts
    231
    Likes
    2,222
    Do not know, what intention the seller of this watch has had.
    But I bought my Seamaster Calendar because of this beautiful black gilt dial in stainless steel case.
    As you know, you cannot find genuine black dialed Omegas very often and I love this golden writing on the black dial.

    That was my intention.
    I have taken a lot of risks, because the seller of my watch has made his pics under bad light.
    I even could not see the gilt dial, but have guessed such a dial.
     
  17. ConElPueblo Feb 6, 2019

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    You're not the first one to be fooled by Omega's reference numbers on the caseback :)
    To me it looks like a "9" as well, compare the shape with the "8" earlier in the ref. and you'll spot the differences.
     
    omegaswisst likes this.
  18. KP-99 Feb 6, 2019

    Posts
    231
    Likes
    2,222
    It is possible.
    Have only this pic of the inside of the back and thought, it could be a "4".

    Nevertheless, these watches are so nice.
    After the service at my Omega certified watchmaker, the watch will look even better.
    He is a passionate watchmaker and has the same model with silver dial.
     
    ConElPueblo likes this.
  19. omegaswisst Feb 6, 2019

    Posts
    573
    Likes
    1,362
    When I mentioned the last digit of the case reference number I did not mean the '4'

    I was referring to the '284x' where the 'x' looks like a '9'
     
  20. ConElPueblo Feb 6, 2019

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    Yours look great :thumbsup: