I was looking at this on eBay, it has T Swiss made T dial, but is in quite literarily unbelievable condition. Is some one making up these dials now? The bezel is like no other I have seen, case and caseback seem good. It would be nice to hear a knowledgeable opinion.

s-l1600-2 by Simon Barnes, on Flickr

 

Obviously not an original dial.

 

bezel is ok

 

Could those pin holes be any more obvious? [/Ross Geller]

 

This is the reference without the minute hand, right?

 

What's wrong with it? No much.
B-type bezel from 1964-1965 is not ok with the rest of the watch.
Movement 24724058 from 1967 is ok with big triangle, sword hands and CB case back
1171 633 bracelet is from the seventies.
It looks like one of mine:

 

100% correct B bezel

 

I thought the B has a 1 with the nub like this number.

 

It has, it's dark

 

LOL, ok.

 

The second hand looks wrong, the hair tip is too short and the lume marker to close to the chapter ring. I don't get the story either. Perfect dial with one hand missing and one skeleton, why? It is hard to study the dial properly in these pictures, but something is tickling my alarm bells.

Edit: Although having said that it does look very similar to yours uwsearch. Are there two shapes of second hand?