josiahg52
路S Speedy13You don't get me!
You are talking from your perspective and you think this is what it is.
I am talking from my perspective and it's different.
I purchased Hamilton watches and they run within -2 to +3spd - no point to lie that's real!
It means the watch could be within just 1 minute per month. Even for 2 months you don't need to reset them.
No, I don't and you're Hamilton is pure junk compared to my Omega Seamaster. Therefore Omega is superior to Hamilton.
I had and have Omegas and they don't run like this. That's why I am asking for reliability, for accuracy. I like the brand but I don't see performance... both in reliability and accuracy. I don't see any benefit. That's why I am asking normal questions like is it possible to regulate it better?
Possible? It's not even required because as you can see my Omegas run the best. Omegas are the best, are super-reliable, and super-accurate. They are the best, plain and simple.
Ok, imagine you have 6 watches. 4 of them costs not more than $2k each once. You have an Omegas that costs thousands more and they are less accurate. How do you feel then? I have to mention not 1 Omega.
Are they running per the manufacturer's specifications? Is the hypothetical Omega? You know what you're buying. Omega - just like all the other brands who care - loudly proclaim their performance expectations. And how are you measuring accuracy? It probably differs significantly, putting it mildly, from how the manufacturer does. Wearing a watch inserts all sorts of inaccuracies. Rest assured, Omega and the others will consider your concern under warranty if you feel there is an issue. They might tell you to screw but they'll look at it.