charleswonjun
·Hello guys,
I'm writing to ask for some input to gain some perspective on an issue: for those of you collecting vintage Speedmasters, do you guys care at all about how well it keeps time? Should it be a reasonably important determinant in my decision to purchase a vintage watch?
I recently acquired a 1995 3592.50 (maybe it isn't old enough to be considered vintage). During the buying process, I was sure to do some research - research on what original parts look like, what the correct bracelet/end links are, whether the case was overly re-finished. I also paid extra for box and papers.
Although I'm quite satisfied with the purchase in terms of the watch's exterior, I find that it consistently gains about 50 secs/day. I feel like it is in "working condition," but can't help feeling a little disappointed with the precision of the watch.
Being a beginner in collecting older watches, I feel like I am wrongly applying the same criteria I use when purchasing modern watches.
I'm writing to ask for some input to gain some perspective on an issue: for those of you collecting vintage Speedmasters, do you guys care at all about how well it keeps time? Should it be a reasonably important determinant in my decision to purchase a vintage watch?
I recently acquired a 1995 3592.50 (maybe it isn't old enough to be considered vintage). During the buying process, I was sure to do some research - research on what original parts look like, what the correct bracelet/end links are, whether the case was overly re-finished. I also paid extra for box and papers.
Although I'm quite satisfied with the purchase in terms of the watch's exterior, I find that it consistently gains about 50 secs/day. I feel like it is in "working condition," but can't help feeling a little disappointed with the precision of the watch.
Being a beginner in collecting older watches, I feel like I am wrongly applying the same criteria I use when purchasing modern watches.