Forums Latest Members

Anyone see Christie’s results last night? Omega did well

  1. southtexas Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    902
    Likes
    1,229
  2. jhross98 Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    1,294
    Likes
    2,185
    we have entered a new "permanent" zip code for 2915s it would seem. .
     
    bazamu likes this.
  3. cristos71 Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    7,155
    Likes
    32,935
    Extraordinarily well defined lugs......:cautious:
     
    eugeneandresson and Philou like this.
  4. Exiztence Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    258
    Likes
    219
    I am surprised by how well the 2998-4 went compared to 105.002 considering neither of them were perfect.
     
  5. Philou Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    236
    Likes
    478
  6. eugeneandresson 'I used a hammer, a chisel, and my fingers' Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    5,001
    Likes
    14,594
    kkt, leatherstrap and Philou like this.
  7. Philou Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    236
    Likes
    478
    People are nuts ! ::facepalm2::
     
    Joe_A, kkt, Uniqez and 1 other person like this.
  8. bazamu wincer, not a bidder Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    1,678
    Likes
    7,227
    The 2998-4 result was quite surprising to me. Can anyone think of a non-tropical -4 (or similar -3/-5) that were in that zip code? I cannot.
     
  9. jhross98 Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    1,294
    Likes
    2,185
    agree on the 2998-4. seemed very high

    one owner honest all original gilt sub. . .not my cup of tea but. . .there appears to still be a crazy premium bid for truly original wathces
     
  10. robocaspar Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    624
    Likes
    404
    Heeeey. That 2915-1 is only a few hundred serial away from mine.
     
    Etp095, Baz9614 and watchknut like this.
  11. padders Oooo subtitles! Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    8,982
    Likes
    13,922
    The buyer of the recent $400k 2915 must be a bit nervous that this on the face of it superior one with a less dodgy bezel and presumably original lume didn’t do better than his.
     
  12. MaiLollo Jun 14, 2018

    Posts
    1,560
    Likes
    4,331
    The 105.002 wasn't ugly though, not the greatest but not an ugly watch. I'm surprised by the price achieved by the 2998, the 2915's didn't.
     
  13. about3blank Nov 13, 2018

    Posts
    105
    Likes
    209
    Sorry for the mild necro, but I'm surprised the non-leaf 2998-4 going for $62,500 hasn't made more of a hubbub in these here parts. Just a collective curious shrug... This seems like a groundbreaking price for what looks like an extremely nice but not totally jaw dropping mid-2998. (Please let me know if I'm missing something spectacular about this particular piece.)

    Are we really that convinced that this was just two overeager bidders? Or have nice mid/late-2998s really been achieving those heights in private collector deals lately?

    The 2998 value question has been been nagging at me especially hard the past few days for some reason... lack of realistic options notwithstanding :confused:
     
  14. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Nov 13, 2018

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    I've sold a couple 2998s over the past 12 months, and none were close to this... they were all roughly in line with speedmaster101 pricing though.

    I'd suggest auctions like this are anomalous, and don't reflect the general rule.

    IMG-20180429-WA0005.jpg
     
    Davidt, viwa64, bloomy and 4 others like this.
  15. nonuffinkbloke #1 Nigel Mansell Fan Nov 13, 2018

    Posts
    2,145
    Likes
    5,379
    Good lord! What a beautiful watch Joel. I could do with some "anomalous" 105.012 results @oddboy. :D Just to help things along a bit.::shy::
     
    oddboy likes this.
  16. rcs914 Nov 13, 2018

    Posts
    2,499
    Likes
    3,591
  17. MCC Nov 14, 2018

    Posts
    589
    Likes
    529
    That 2998 looks to be in great shape, you don't see many this good in my view