Anybody Own The Current Model Seamaster 300m 2324.30.41.21.01.001?

Posts
9,541
Likes
52,581
I jerk off 10 times a day, yes with my left hand even though I am a righty, and still nothing.

Nothing.
We HAVE to get this guy to attend the next Mid-Atlantic G2G. We won’t need to worry about entertainment for the afternoon.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,982
We HAVE to get this guy to attend the next Mid-Atlantic G2G. We won’t need to worry about entertainment for the afternoon.
Sounds like he’s having a fine time entertaining himself.
 
Posts
9,541
Likes
52,581
I was referring only to his sense of humor. Geez, I hope it's just his sense of humor. 😲
 
Posts
3,652
Likes
7,731
Yeah but somebody needs to tell him it's not the quantity, but the duration, of exercise routines... 😵‍💫

Sounds like he’s having a fine time entertaining himself.
 
Posts
5,501
Likes
9,399
Geez, I hope it's just his sense of humor. 😲
The Magic 8-Ball says... "Doubtful"
 
Posts
3,570
Likes
24,091
Yeah but somebody needs to tell him it's not the quantity, but the duration, of exercise routines... 😵‍💫

I believe this is what bodybuilders refer to as 'time under tension'.
 
Posts
3,652
Likes
7,731
Actually, I have a related question. @Donn Chambers or anybody else, do you know if the new bracelet will fit the previous generation? I put mine on a bracelet for several days, and I like it except boy is it shiny.

Obviously brushing my bracelet would be cheaper but there are some other differences between the two bracelets.. so I was curious
 
Posts
26
Likes
36
do you know if the new bracelet will fit the previous generation?
The current generation Seamster 300 MC 234.30.41.21.01.001 bracelet does NOT FIT
the previous generation Seamster 300 MC 233.30.41.21.01.001. (2014 version)
 
Posts
3,652
Likes
7,731
Thanks. Kinda figured but it was worth a shot

The current generation Seamster 300 MC 234.30.41.21.01.001 bracelet does NOT FIT
the previous generation Seamster 300 MC 233.30.41.21.01.001. (2014 version)
 
Posts
26
Likes
36
This hurts me to. The new generation bracelet has tapering and wears more comfortable compared to the old ones.
 
Posts
3,652
Likes
7,731
Agreed. The major points in favor of the newer SMH is the bracelet. It's not as comfortable, and it is so polished that it takes away from the liquidmetal ring (which stands out nicely on most straps).

Thankfully I like wearing this watch on a NATO but I wish I liked the bracelet more.

This hurts me to. The new generation bracelet has tapering and wears more comfortable compared to the old ones.
 
Posts
420
Likes
490
Love the design, just wish it was thinner. Puzzling to see so many vintage design cues, but not the thin vintage form factor.
Well actually the original version of this watch, the CK2913, was equally thick at 14mm.
 
Posts
513
Likes
768
I purchased my 234.30.41.21.03.001 in August 2022.

I had an Indian wedding to attend, and I wanted something that would work with my suit as well as my sherwani. I found this piece worked perfectly with casual, suits, and sherwanis. The blue dial complemented the clothes and was able to fit within the fitted cuffs.

I have nothing but anecdotal accuracy, but I echo @Donn Chambers as far as it time-keeping. If i wear it 24x7, it will drift 2 seconds for a week. But, if I rotate between it and my Agua Terra, I will loose about 2 seconds a day.

I don't find it too thick or too bulky, I highly recommend the 300 Heritage / Sandwich .

Time for the pictures....

Edited: