Forums Latest Members

Any thoughts on this UG TriCompax

  1. jpowell Apr 15, 2015

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    I'm curious about why the forum thinks and recommendations on care/restoration approach?

    Thanks. image.jpg
     
  2. jpowell Apr 16, 2015

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    No thoughts?

    I should have said - I’m curious about what the forum thinks?

    I was hoping the expert forum members would have a view…

    Thanks.
     
  3. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Apr 16, 2015

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    Looks all original but for the possible exception of a relume and some finagling with the running seconds hand. I'd characterize the dial as a little tired. If I were passionate about this watch I would try to put the lume and second hand right, provide a complete service and leave it at that. Is there anything specific you would like to know?
     
  4. jpowell Apr 16, 2015

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    Thanks. I’m trying to understand if the “right” thing to do is to try to get it back to NOS condition or if the better approach is to embrace the aging… Kind of like life really :) To botox or not to botox… Would you recommend trying to relume? Who is good at doing that in the US?

    Thanks again.
     
  5. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Apr 16, 2015

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    Definitely embrace the aging. This isn't a watch for the "ooh-shiny! crowd, it's a connoisseur's piece. And to a connoisseur there is little less appealing than an over-restored watch.


    I'd like to know who is good at relume as well/
     
  6. 10H10 Apr 20, 2015

    Posts
    464
    Likes
    1,096
    First time I see Tri-Compax in a whole word "Tricompax" without the "-" or a blank space, isn't that an old redial ?
     
    x3no likes this.
  7. jpowell Apr 20, 2015

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    How could I tell?
     
  8. woodwkr2 Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    1,366
    Likes
    819
    No. The dial is completely original.
     
  9. 10H10 May 5, 2015

    Posts
    464
    Likes
    1,096
    Ah !? They misspell Tri-Compax on purpose ? I don't get it.
     
  10. woodwkr2 May 5, 2015

    Posts
    1,366
    Likes
    819
    Omitting the dash is different than "misspelling".

    The dial is correct.

    Welcome to the wide, strange world of Universal.
     
  11. 10H10 May 5, 2015

    Posts
    464
    Likes
    1,096
    Hmmm... I don't share LouS opinion, this watch was made to be beautiful and it's way more pleasurable to the eye to look at a beautiful watch when you read time than to a beaten up one, same thing goes with women, I'm sure that you wouldn't let yours at the age of 45 with gray hairs, hairy legs, unwashed and without makeup just because she was born like that.
    Conoisseur are not masochists, how come you never see Patek watches in such poor conditions ? Furthermore, U.G. is particulary famous because of their elegant designs "Le couturier de la montre".
    If Sala's watches are so beautiful it's because they are restored, nobody wants a 18th century commode Boulle in ruin at home (or museum) and nobody leaves it like that if they find it in ruin, guess why ?
    As you probably understood, considering that the case is in good shape, if you find a nice and clean original dial, I woud strongly recommend to swap them and keep the old one if you want.
    Cheers.
     
    Watchsmuggler likes this.
  12. Watchsmuggler May 5, 2015

    Posts
    16
    Likes
    28
    All in all it is matter of taste and what for you collect watches. At a certain point it can make sense to have 'untouched' watches for investment purposes and restored for wearing : )

    Of course you can find Pateks in poor condition, but rarely. And yes, it is getting really tricky (while some dial makers do real masterpieces of refinishing) to spot redone dial.