Any concerns with this 2852?

Posts
309
Likes
360
I’ve always loved the look of the arrowhead markers on this era of Constellation, but admittedly I don’t know them as well as I should. A couple questions here:

1. Any glaring issues? The movement looks a bit tired, and the case has clearly seen some polishing

2. It’s hard to tell with the black dial, but would this reference be a pie pan or dome dial?

thanks as always for the expertise!
 
Posts
13,483
Likes
31,779
Personally I don't like the dial and it's not going to get any better with age.

The movement is not just tired, it's really tired, not helped by the missing gasket which probably hasn't been there for years.

What's the outside of the back look like?
 
Posts
6,706
Likes
52,817
I wouldn't know a tired movement if I dropped it on my big toe.
 
Posts
3,412
Likes
13,210
Pie pan dial - note how the minute ticks aren’t positioned in a perfect circle but always move slightly inwards between the 5-minute-indices.

If you like the looks of the dial (and the case, there’s nothing left of the bevel on the bezel), if the price reflects the numerous issues of the watch, and if you’re ok with a project (eg possibly sourcing a replacement 505) it might be ok. Those are three big if’s… For this to be a potentially worthwhile purchase it’d definitely need to be sub 1k$ in my opinion. Personally, I’d pass.
 
Posts
309
Likes
360
Personally I don't like the dial and it's not going to get any better with age.

The movement is not just tired, it's really tired, not helped by the missing gasket which probably hasn't been there for years.

What's the outside of the back look like?
Outside of the caseback isn’t great. Missing a couple stars from polishing.

The dial… I have mixed feelings about, as photographs tend to skew reality. I’ve seen dials in photos that look terrible in person, and vice versa. I do appreciate that the seller took what appears to be honest pictures of the dial. But I agree that it looks a little too far gone for my tastes.
 
Posts
309
Likes
360
Pie pan dial - note how the minute ticks aren’t positioned in a perfect circle but always move slightly inwards between the 5-minute-indices.

If you like the looks of the dial (and the case, there’s nothing left of the bevel on the bezel), if the price reflects the numerous issues of the watch, and if you’re ok with a project (eg possibly sourcing a replacement 505) it might be ok. Those are three big if’s… For this to be a potentially worthwhile purchase it’d definitely need to be sub 1k$ in my opinion. Personally, I’d pass.

yeah, if the movement is too far gone for resurrection through a servicing, that would be a hard pass from me. Good call on the missing gasket, I didn’t catch that.

I guess I’ll keep looking. Finding the “right” one isn’t getting any easier!
 
Posts
13,483
Likes
31,779
I wouldn't know a tired movement if I dropped it on my big toe.

Just in case this wasn't a rhetorical answer, this one's a bit better.

 
Posts
6,706
Likes
52,817
Well no. It was honest ignorance.

The example you provide X350 XJR, is sharp.
 
Posts
411
Likes
626
I too like arrowheads indices 👍 Nice looking watch.

Not an expert because am still learning.
To my believe of neophyte in case of gold letterings on ‘gilt’ black dial golden wordings are printed directly on brass dial base then black ink is applied over gold letterings - sorry for my approximative English 😀
@Poday please inspect this aspect of print process. On dial you posted gold wordings to me seem raised above glossy black paint.
For my education please affirm or refute me. Thanks in advance

PS: Below is an illustration of what I described above although my pic of gilt is a Seamaster one and sorry for low quality photo.
 
Posts
309
Likes
360
I too like arrowheads indices 👍 Nice looking watch.

Not an expert because am still learning.
To my believe of neophyte in case of gold letterings on ‘gilt’ black dial golden wordings are printed directly on brass dial base then black ink is applied over gold letterings - sorry for my approximative English 😀
@Poday please inspect this aspect of print process. On dial you posted gold wordings to me seem raised above glossy black paint.
For my education please affirm or refute me. Thanks in advance

PS: Below is an illustration of what I described above although my pic of gilt is a Seamaster one and sorry for low quality photo.
I believe you’re correct, though it’s hard to tell in the photos. I think the dial is correct, just aged.
 
Posts
460
Likes
797
For a black dial with arrowheads, the dial (assuming original, and I think it is) is actually in pretty good condition. These are not easy to find (none on a quick search on eBay, and two on Chrono24). While the other criticisms are legit, I still think this is worth pursuing, at the right price. Less than $1k is a pipe dream. IMHO, this one would bring at least $1500 at auction despite to condition issues.
 
Posts
897
Likes
3,713
Since this is a watch that I have for sale I will just include the full description below with summary points here: Original gilt pie pan arrow head dial, 2852, polished case, and movement, although "tired" (potentially from harsh cleaning) is keeping time within 4 seconds per day according to my timing which was conducted over 24 hrs. I have it listed at 2.5k on other FS platforms but would be open to offers. Although I respect @MtV opinon greatly I think finding an original gilt pie pan cross hair arrow head 2852 for sub 1k is difficult to say the least.

I have included photos and description below to further the discussion on this watch - not to make a FS post. I encourage discussion and those who know me know very well that I am very open to constructive critism as I am always constantly looking to learn. If this FS post is off base, wrong, mispriced I am open.





ABOUT THIS WATCH:

MANUFACTURER: Omega

MODEL: Constellation

REFERENCE: 2852

SERIAL: 16xxxxx

YEAR: 1958

CASE: The previously polished 35mm yellow gold cap over steel case is in good shape. It still retains its original omega signed crystal. The case presents with light wear throughout commensurate with age. There are some markings on the caseback from someone attempting to open the watch while not using the proper tools. The gold observatory medallion has been polished with 3 stars still distinctly visible. The medallion and gold capped lugs/bezel have taken on a charming, vintage, rozy patina in certain areas. The case is complete with an authentic clover omega crown. There is debate among collectors on whether this reference came with a clover crown or only the more common decagonal crown.

DIAL: Uncommon, non-luminous, original, gilt, pie-pan, crosshair dial in the most desirable applied arrowhead hour marker configuration. Its in great shape with even gold specking across the dial that can be more or less noticeable depending on the lighting situation or the viewing angle. It is completed by matching, original non-luminous dauphine hands.

MOVEMENT: Omega automatic caliber 505 chronometer certified. Automatic self winding. 24 jewels, 19800 frequency, 46hr power reserve. Service history is unknown. The watch winds, sets and runs. It was timed over 24hours. The 24 hours included periods of wear and non-wear. Over those 24hours the watch gained 4 seconds.
Edited:
 
Posts
3,412
Likes
13,210
Less than $1k is a pipe dream. IMHO, this one would bring at least $1500 at auction despite to condition issues.

I never said it wouldnt bring 1.5k in an auction - it might well do so. Note that a redialed black 2852 would likely do the same and I still wouldnt claim it to be worth >1k. I said for it to be worthwhile pursuing it'd need to be in this price range, and I explicitly stated in my opinion. In the meantime, I've learnt that it actually comes from a trustworthy seller and the movement is running well. Which is a completely different story.

We've discussed this here often, the credentials of the seller make a huge difference to the price. Judging by the post of the OP, I had to assume that a) the seller is unknown and b) we have zero information regarding the movement, which means a write-off is definitely realistic given the visual condition. Knowing that the movement runs well (and thus might well have been serviced in the not too distant past), that eliminates a huge unknown and raises the price I'd be ok paying significantly.

edit: Ah, I was slightly slower than @TheGreekPhysique 😀
Edited:
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,999
When I got my first job with the gubmint as a we boy, my boss told me to always remember that you don’t know who is sitting at the next table when you start talking.
Glad y’all didn’t start trashing a seller you didn’t know was a member here and kept it focused on the watch.
I know nothing about Connie’s (because they aren’t authorized for Snorkeling), but I do know arrowhead, plus gilt dial= uncommon.
Also appreciate Niko inviting the feedback rather than having a knee-jerk reaction to criticism- class act.
 
Posts
2,450
Likes
7,053
x1522339-a8543c0b305d89328d6a9fca942320e8.jpg.pagespeed.ic.rST744n3x-.webp
Dead Pringles...
 
Posts
3,412
Likes
13,210
Also appreciate Niko inviting the feedback rather than having a knee-jerk reaction to criticism- class act.

100%!
 
Posts
9,769
Likes
54,862
I can only add that I have purchased three watches from Niko, including two arrowhead Constellations, and I have been very satisfied with those purchases. None of the three are perfect (still waiting after many years to see my first flawless vintage watch), but they are nonetheless very good and they were all accurately and honestly described. Niko knows that I have high expectations, that I am much larger than he is, that I know where he lives, and that I wouldn’t hesitate to beat him repeatedly with a club studded with nails and broken glass if he did me wrong. In short, he’s trustworthy. I also know MtV - an esteemed OF member who has always been helpful to me, provided a ton of good advice, and who has done me more than a few favors (most recently, thanks for the free decagonal crown, Matt!). Bottom line: these are two gentlemen members of OF for whom I have great respect. The watch isn’t perfect, as no vintage watch is, but it’s certainly a rarity with an original black dial and very worthy of consideration.