Forums Latest Members

Another comparison thread... what would you choose?

  1. wayneG Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    187
    Likes
    302
    My recent left or right thread left me thinking I had made my mind up with the Seamaster. I was all set to stick with the purchase of a new ceramic model. That was until I came across a couple of older stock, but brand new watches.

    I hate asking for comparisons as it's all about individual taste, of course. However I feel it would be interesting to see the opinions of the Omega community as maybe some things will be raised that I haven't thought about.

    The options are now:

    1) Omega Seamaster Professional GMT... This is a watch I've briefly owned in the past, but had to sell to fund something else. I regretted it at the time as it's a great travel option, with a true GMT, good water resistance and I like how the bezel will fade over time.
    2) Omega Planet Ocean 42mm 2500 Co-Ax... My favourite series of the PO. The current model is much taller and more cumbersome on my smallish wrist.
    3) Omega Seamaster Professional Ceramic... The current best "value" Omega next to the Speedy Pro.

    [​IMG]
     
    Edited Aug 6, 2017
  2. No.15 Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    380
    Likes
    1,295
    I like the PO but agree that they are to thick. The hands on the other 2 don't do it for me.
     
    Gasman likes this.
  3. sweejin Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    11
    Likes
    21
    SMPc for me
     
  4. Shailor Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    415
    Likes
    480
    Ceramic every time
     
  5. w.finkenstaedt Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    680
    Likes
    728
    Personally I'd go for the GMT, I think it's undervalued and they're fairly rare. It's more interesting to me than the new ceramic versions and definitely more interesting than a black PO (which is about as close to a boring Sub as you can get with Omega).
     
    Paedipod likes this.
  6. WatchVaultNYC Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    3,719
    Likes
    4,190
    All good watches, but I choose the PO above for the following reasons:

    - interesting and clean dial
    - great lume
    - big easy to use crown
    - progenitor of it's line

    Ceramic looks too much like a toy

    GMT is great but the dial is busy, plus the area around the crown guard is poorly designed. Add with a smallish crown it's pretty hard to screw down
     
    Foo2rama, Jwit and Linzer like this.
  7. Gasman Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    389
    Likes
    210
    +1
     
    Foo2rama likes this.
  8. McJamesT Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    229
    Likes
    141
    My second vote for ceramic today. This keeps up I may have to get one too. Feel like i'm starting to miss out here!
     
    Shailor likes this.
  9. Andreas Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    530
    Likes
    3,539
    The PO from the options above or if you like the wavy dial i would go for a 2254.50.
    Agree with what the others said about the skeleton hands.
     
  10. jud Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    613
    Likes
    325
    I personally prefer the ceramic with second choice being the PO. The GMT dive watch doesn't make sense to me, especially with the HE valve.
     
  11. wayneG Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    187
    Likes
    302
    Thanks for the replies. I'm surprised the GMT isn't getting more love
     
  12. _Omega_ Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    135
    Likes
    109
    If you're going to put it on the original bracelet, I'd say PO. If it's on the mesh, then I'd go GMT.
     
  13. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Can't we vote with pics?

    20170806_141153-2268x3024.jpg
     
  14. herold Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    384
    Likes
    3,302
    Ceramic SMP!
     
  15. w.finkenstaedt Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    680
    Likes
    728
    Because divers never travel? Uh...

    HEV doesn't make sense on any dive watch, really. No one is gonna use it except for pro divers, and even then that's only for saturation diving.
     
    Foo2rama likes this.
  16. Shailor Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    415
    Likes
    480
    But it adds to the "coolness" factor.
     
  17. noelekal Home For Wayward Watches Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    5,548
    Likes
    38,777
    Door No. 2.
     
  18. Jwit Not a doctor, but plays one on ΩF Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    2,361
    Likes
    12,632
    Versatility wise I would prefer the PO. I think it looks better with different straps and bracelets, and could potentially (following more modern trends) be dressed up and work with a suit. SMPc is not as versatile. However I prefer the SMPc on the wrist, and would choose this. Not a fan of the GMT, too busy/unbalanced IMHO.
     
  19. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Aug 7, 2017

    Posts
    17,104
    Likes
    25,348
    2500d 42mm PO's are just now getting the notice they deserve. They are not thick and are by far the thinnest of the PO line. Black bezel white numbers is the way to go.

    Plus look at it, it's a beautiful interpretation of the original... better then the 300mc in some ways.

    Mark my words they are going to go up.
     
  20. nurseford25 Aug 7, 2017

    Posts
    1,119
    Likes
    5,981
    PO is the best looking dive watch omega makes, in my opinion. The only SMP's that really do it for me are the 2531 and the 2254. The ceramic is great but they are just too shiny for my taste.