An interesting Speedmaster

Posts
418
Likes
387
Dear All,
I would like, today, to present an interesting watch.
Indeed, here is a watch that this friend of mine owns since 1969 .. actually, he is the second owner, but the first owner kept the watch only 3 or 4 months and then traded it to pay for the repair of the gearbox of his car, my friend running a service station, at the time ..!

I have always seen that watch on the wrist of my friend, and I know him since 30 years .. I like the idea of an item that serves since 51 years !

Since day one, this watch was serviced only two times, each time by Omega official .. each time crown and pushers were replaced, the originals were deliverd to the owner and he still has those. Each time the watch was cleaned and lightly polished, the crystal replaced.
The original bracelet weared out (stretched) and he got another bracelet from Omega. He still has the original one though.
The owner is not particularly interested in watches, was happy to have a good product, and just utilized it as a quality tool.

He was amazed when I told him that such watches were valuable, with value increasing.
As you can see, it is a speedmaster reference 145022- 69ST, not sure how to call it .. it is not a 321 movement, it is a 861 movement .. it is pre-moon ofcourse, from 1969 I suppose.
The reference number on the movement is 31314715
The movement is very clean and according to the owner still runs strongly, shifting 3 or 4 second/day .. within COSC !
The watch shows signs of age, but no deep scatches, no overpolishing .. just in need of a thorough cleaning (and ofcourse a complete service), and probably a crystal replacement or polywatched.
The back is weared out .. the engraving is still visible but barely.
The dial is 100% original and in good shape.
The bezel is not a DON bezel and shows signs of age.

One does not meet very often a one owner watch, 51 years old with full past history known, completey original !


The images :


I ‘d love to hear your opinions !
Thank you for your attention,
 
Posts
441
Likes
1,383
Thank you for this great story!
I love to hear / read stories about someone who has a watch that has been with them for a long time and is still totally reliable. Sometimes I am jealous that these people have only worn this watch all their lives and have experienced all the things they have experienced with just this one watch. Sometimes I would also like to simply not keep chasing this light-heartedness for the next "grail", but only to be completely satisfied with one watch and only wear it until the end of my life.
 
Posts
521
Likes
1,261
Thanks Malilis. For a time I was taken away to a world of garages, cars and a lone Omega. I too love the romanticism that comes with a one watch, one lifetime, every scratch ethic.
 
Posts
2,011
Likes
3,396
A great watch, and a great story. I love these watches that have just been used for their intended purpose for many years, and looked after well. It just shows what a high quality product they were/are that it is practically identical to a 2020 model and is still going strong.
 
Posts
29,674
Likes
76,836
So Omega gouged up the case back, and sent it back in that condition? That seems unlikely...
 
Posts
418
Likes
387
So Omega gouged up the case back, and sent it back in that condition? That seems unlikely...
I am not sure to understand what you mean .. actually, the last service was in 1992 ..! by Omega .. and if there is a watch about which we can be certain of the history, it is this one .. in a period of 30 years since this last service the back has indeed weared out .. and for once that an Omega service did not throw away most of the parts a little bit old we are not going to complain are we ?
 
Posts
4,593
Likes
10,810
I am not sure to understand what you mean

It's obvious the case back was damaged by a novice attempting to open the watch.
 
Posts
418
Likes
387
oh .. that was the meaning .. it must have happened since the last service .. by whom, I have no idea .. I will ask him
 
Posts
29,674
Likes
76,836
I am not sure to understand what you mean .. actually, the last service was in 1992 ..! by Omega .. and if there is a watch about which we can be certain of the history, it is this one .. in a period of 30 years since this last service the back has indeed weared out .. and for once that an Omega service did not throw away most of the parts a little bit old we are not going to complain are we ?

This is not wear...

img_6350-jpg.1071127

It's damage from opening the case, likely with some sort of hand held Jaxa style tool. Omega would have used a proper opener in a base to prevent this type of damage. And if they did somehow damage it, I would have expected them to polish the damage out, or replace the case back. Unless someone did this opening the case for the photos you are showing, it seems unlikely to me that this damage was done at Omega, and so I suspect it has been serviced somewhere else over the life of the watch.

Family history of a particular item is not always accurate, and people don't always remember exactly what they did with something.
 
Posts
418
Likes
387
This is not wear...

img_6350-jpg.1071127

It's damage from opening the case, likely with some sort of hand held Jaxa style tool. Omega would have used a proper opener in a base to prevent this type of damage. And if they did somehow damage it, I would have expected them to polish the damage out, or replace the case back. Unless someone did this opening the case for the photos you are showing, it seems unlikely to me that this damage was done at Omega, and so I suspect it has been serviced somewhere else over the life of the watch.

Family history of a particular item is not always accurate, and people don't always remember exactly what they did with something.
Yes I understood from your previous message and you are right somebody dammaged the back .. in the past but after the last service ... I saw it but took it as part of the watch history .. that watch was utilized day after day by a mechanic !
 
Posts
418
Likes
387
Yes I understood from your previous message and you are right somebody dammaged the back .. in the past but after the last service ... I saw it but took it as part of the watch history .. that watch was utilized day after day by a mechanic !
and no there was no other service than the two my friend mentioned .. no reason not to believe him .. somebody did do the dammage while trying to open the case
 
Posts
29,674
Likes
76,836
and no there was no other service than the two my friend mentioned .. no reason not to believe him .. somebody did do the dammage while trying to open the case

Then why was someone opening the case?
 
Posts
3,785
Likes
20,205
Then why was someone opening the case?
Maybe to take those movement pictures?
 
Posts
418
Likes
387
Then why was someone opening the case?
who knows ..! curiosity .. I myself when acquiring a vintage would always open it (when I can) even though I cannot work on the movement .. or later to regulate it .. here I don’t know what did happen
 
Posts
1,430
Likes
2,957
Thank you for sharing. A watch that has lived almost everyday with its owner and has all the bumps and bruises to show for it. No babying this icon...
I guess that is why I am always amazed when I see a vintage watch in mint condition... part of me is sad that the watch never "lived", but part of me is glad to view such a wonderful example of time past.
 
Posts
825
Likes
1,804
Odd tangent to go off on accusing the sharer or someone of damaging the case back. Who cares? He stated the back was worn out. The watch isn’t for sale. What’s next, a decimation of its “unattractive” dial?

it’s cool as it is .. a mechanics watch.
 
Posts
504
Likes
1,951
Great story. Thanks for posting.

Is the current bracelet an 1171?
Pictures of the clasp would be interesting to see.

Also pictures of the original bracelet and clasp would be interesting.

Note that the serial number 31314715 is estimated to be made in April 1971 (using the ilovemyspeedmaster.com website).
.