mozambique
·I agree that the 002 dial has some marks that could not occur behind the crystal. However I find the grey washed out appearance more attractive than choc
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
The 1035 bracelet on the 002 combined with one real and one non original end link also tend to scream spare parts
Why is this a 105.003 dial and not a 105.002 dial?
Hi All,
Please allow me to clear a few things up for you all from the horses mouth so to speak.
The watch has most definitely been fully serviced and by that I mean the entire movement by a very good watchmaker and at considerable expense.
The crystal has been replaced but the original one that I found the watch with was exactly the same (have the old crystal still) and it covered the bottom of the dial markings.
A pusher has been replaced as I mentioned in the ad.
The hands...I have read various comments and it was the opinion of Dsio among others over the life of this forum, and myself after looking at the serial of this particular watch, that these 105002 mostly came with Alpha hands, and since the original hands were in need of replacement or reluming I chose to source what I believe to be the original hands, 1960s Alphas with a similar colour lume to match the plots.
The chrono I preferred this style to the later white one as it matched the colour of the dial and silver Alphas and for 35$ someone can change it back if they wish as I don't think this effects the originality of the watch judging by some of the rubbish I see.
As for sitting I a drawer this is poetic license as a means of describing how the watch looked when it came to me. I think the semantics of whose drawer it sat in or whether it was a cardboard box or a metal tin and for exactly how long etc etc are never to be know. The watch is clearly very old and had definitely not been worn for many many years & that's all I was alluding to.
The bracelet also came with the watch when I received it (whether it came out the factory with this bracelet I do not know) and with those end links and I am pretty sure I was honest and up front about those too.
The main issue is the dial markings I will try and clear this up that they are indeed Swiss Made but haven't had the time. I did ask my watchmaker to check at the time but have since forgotten what he said but I was not concerned with the answer which leads me to believe it was all correct.
I really don't think I have tried to mislead anyone about anything and if you look at my description of the watch above and on eBay it's one and the same.
The most important thing is this watch, hand on heart, looks absolutely beautiful on the wrist - it's one of the coolest Speedmasters I've personally ever seen but that could be beacuse I love the colour grey - and no one will be disappointed when they see it in person - the colour is unique and it is a 105.002.
As for the price I'm really not making much after what I spent in both money and time etc and I'm easy if I sell it or I don't I'd actually rather keep it but if someone sees the value in this long term as I do they won't quibble. It's only going to be 15 and 20 k in another 3 / 6 years and that's another honest opinion!
Love the forums and for all your help and discussions of such matters they have proved invaluable to me and so I hope you find my response of value also.
Kind regards
$5200 to $10,000

Because the outer printing has the diameter of a 105.003 and not of a 2998 which results in almost covering the printing of the outer minute marking by the silver rehaut. The 105.002 is a transitional watch which was built only for around one year (1962). I have never seen it with the 105.003 dial as we do here but always with the old dial (no TT either around the swiss made) and only the new baton hands.
I would bet that the example here has the TT around the swiss made 😗
Here on this pic we see the correct dial for a 105.002. The swiss made is without the TT and fits perfect inside the silver rehaut covering only half of the swiss made writing. This is how it should look like.
The dial of the discussed example is from a 105.003.
Look at this pic of three 105.003's that I took a couple of years ago:
The left one is the modern service dial from Omega for that watch. In the middle you see a beautiful chocolate dial and this watch has got the silver rehaut from the 2998 inside. Just look, how the 105.003 is slightly to big and how the T swiss made T and the outer printing is covered too much. Just as we see it here.
The 105.003 on the right has the correct dial and the correct black rehaut leaving space to see the full printing.