Forums Latest Members
  1. chiko7734 Nov 4, 2012

    Posts
    567
    Likes
    327
  2. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 4, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    Good, I don't like it.
     
  3. ulackfocus Nov 4, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    "Almost". :p The winner could have had a max bid of $700, but all it took was $227 to beat your $225. You'll never know. ;)
     
  4. chiko7734 Nov 4, 2012

    Posts
    567
    Likes
    327
    Why not? Is that a redial, or is it the discoloring in the movement?
     
  5. chiko7734 Nov 4, 2012

    Posts
    567
    Likes
    327
    That's very true lol
     
  6. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 4, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    Because it looks beat up , the movemtent , the edges of the case back , the dial . Just don't like the over all watch . This is not like Kyle's big waffle Seamaster.
     
  7. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Nov 4, 2012

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
    And the description says that the watch doesn't actually work.....
     
  8. chiko7734 Nov 4, 2012

    Posts
    567
    Likes
    327
    WOW! How did I miss that! That would have been a huge bummer if I won it!
     
  9. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Nov 4, 2012

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
    It says
    "Watch winds and sets, it does run but does not stay running."

    Whatever that means. Now maybe it didn't stay running because it wasn't worn (the seller said to me she doesn't know/understand watches, so maybe it is as simple as that) or maybe something bigger.

    I was interested at under $100 as I do like the dial....
     
  10. pknopp Nov 4, 2012

    Posts
    138
    Likes
    14
    I liked it. I was actually the first bid on it. I knew I would never have ended up with it but I was curious as to what it would bring. I'm sure I will end up buying something less than pristine to mess with. (Not having any idea what I was getting into it would have had to have been under $200)