Advice on 1956 French-cased Constellation

Posts
34
Likes
425
Hi all,

I’d really appreciate some guidance on a French-cased Constellation I’m considering.

I’m getting married in a few days, and my soon-to-be wife would like to give me a watch to mark the occasion. So I feel a certain responsibility to make a good, informed and reasonably rational decision this time –more than I normally do when I’m spending my own money on watches!

For some time I’ve been looking for an excellent example of a vintage gold watch, ideally with a light dial. My wife also keeps reminding me that I already own far too many round watches with black dials which, to her, “all look the same”, so I’m trying to take the hint.

I’ve always been particularly attracted to vintage Constellations: the pie-pan dial, the history, the proportions, and especially the chronometer movements. Also, my grandfather had a beautiful gold Omega chronometer which unfortunately I haven’t inherited, and these watches have always reminded me of him.

I love the classic dog-leg Constellations, but I’ve never been completely convinced by how they would work on my wrist. Mine is 15.5 cm and relatively flat, and I have seen that straight dog-leg lugs seem to “float” slightly above the wrist, almost as overhanging. I’m really looking for something that hugs the wrist properly.

Gold-capped examples also seem like a very sensible, budget friendly option. My concern is mostly knowing myself: I suspect I would end up worrying too much about wearing through the cap, babying the watch unnecessarily, and ultimately wearing it less than I should.

Which brings me to this one: a 1956 French-cased Constellation in solid 18k rose gold, cal. 505, currently offered by a reputable dealer. The case is 35 mm and 42.5 mm lug-to-lug, but is noticeably more curved than the more familiar Constellation cases, which seems particularly promising for my wrist.

From the photographs, both the case and dial look exceptionally well preserved to my eye. The watch has also recently been fully serviced; the dealer reports 310° amplitude, +4 s/day and 0.8 ms beat error.

The asking price is €6,900, which is certainly at the upper end. My thinking is that an unusually good, apparently very original example from a reputable dealer should command a meaningful premium. My wife, incidentally, is rather less concerned about squeezing every last euro and she is happy to accept some dealer premium as long as it comes from a reputable seller, is authentic, and “works”.

Before letting sentiment get the better of me, though, I’d be very grateful for some more experienced eyes.

In particular, I’d appreciate your thoughts on the dial originality/authenticity, the case originality and condition, whether it looks as sharp and unpolished as it appears to me, whether there is anything about the French case or hallmarks I should be checking, and the overall correctness of the watch and movement.

And finally, pricing: acknowledging the dealer premium and apparent condition, does €6,900 still seem defensible, or am I allowing an important occasion to make me too generous with the valuation?

I’ve attached the dealer’s photographs.

Many thanks in advance - and please feel free to be critical. I’d much rather have the romance spoiled now than after the wedding!

P.S.: apologies for the rather long introduction, this one is important.
 
Posts
6,824
Likes
10,493
Well, @Alvaro95, leaving such an important purchase until just a few days before your wedding is asking for trouble. Heart over head and all that.

First of all, this isn’t a pie pan, if that is important to you.

Secondly, being a French case, it is difficult to assess the condition as it may not closely replicate the lines of an original Swiss case.

Finally, others (@cristos71 @MtV ) might chime in - but I think this is a presentable redial.
The fonts aren’t correct - especially in ‘Constellation’.
The cross hair shouldn’t hit the ‘e’ in Constellation as it does.
And the cross hair should kiss the ‘s’ in SWISS MADE’.
 
Posts
13,660
Likes
19,030
That type of lug damage is sometimes seen from gold Constellations originally fitted with the “Deluxe” gold bracelets.


Note the gold tabs attached to the end pieces of the bracelet. That’s a second level of security if the springbars fail. I do not know this for sure, but it is possible that those indentations were made at the factory when the bracelets were fitted.

I’m not going to comment on the dial other than to say it is impossible to properly assess a dial, especially of a watch so frequently redialled like a vintage Constellation, from small compressed pictures on the internet. It must be viewed in person, preferably by an expert in that model.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
24,823
Likes
55,208
I'm also not so comfortable with the dial printing.
 
Posts
3,592
Likes
13,543
Well, @Alvaro95, leaving such an important purchase until just a few days before your wedding is asking for trouble. Heart over head and all that.

First of all, this isn’t a pie pan, if that is important to you.

Secondly, being a French case, it is difficult to assess the condition as it may not closely replicate the lines of an original Swiss case.

Finally, others (@cristos71 @MtV ) might chime in - but I think this is a presentable redial.
The fonts aren’t correct - especially in ‘Constellation’.
The cross hair shouldn’t hit the ‘e’ in Constellation as it does.
And the cross hair should kiss the ‘s’ in SWISS MADE’.
Exactly this. And a few small things. I doubt the amplitude of 310, for example, but it doesn’t matter anymore.

My personal 2 cents: While this is incredibly nice from your fiancé, you’re not doing yourselves any favor by rushing.
 
Posts
104
Likes
52
Congrats on the wedding.. big day,
No expert, but have been looking at dials for the past 6 months before buying mine. This dial is just not right. I have not seen a cross hair pass the 6 o’clock marker before and the the relation to the chronometer is not right. from this site.
 
Posts
6,824
Likes
10,493
Congrats on the wedding.. big day,
No expert, but have been looking at dials for the past 6 months before buying mine. This dial is just not right. I have not seen a cross hair pass the 6 o’clock marker before and the the relation to the chronometer is not right. from this site.

You’re right in saying the dial doesn’t pass the MOY test but this is often the case in early constellations.
But as this is a redial you’re right to point it out - but it the relationship to AUTOMATIC that’s wrong.

ALL dome dials with cross hairs have the cross hairs go to the edge of the dial.
If they don’t it’s a redial.
Cross hairs on pie pans stop at the edge of the central plain.
 
Posts
104
Likes
52
You’re right in saying the dial doesn’t pass the MOY test but this is often the case in early constellations.
But as this is a redial you’re right to point it out - but it the relationship to AUTOMATIC that’s wrong.

ALL dome dials with cross hairs have the cross hairs go to the edge of the dial.
If they don’t it’s a redial.
Cross hairs on pie pans stop at the edge of the central plain.
thanks, I did not know that
can you explain the relationship to the automatic?
 
Posts
6,824
Likes
10,493
The MOY test means the vertical crosshair passes through:
the first peak of the M in AUTOMATIC.
The centre of the second O on CHRONOMETER
Kiss the right hand branch of the Y in OFFICIALLY.

Except where it doesn’t…..
 
Posts
6,824
Likes
10,493
ok, so not a full proof test

Not fool proof but very useful once you know which Constellation references should comply and those that might not.
 
Posts
104
Likes
52
it would be good to have a list on this forum of the different variations, perhaps it already exists?
 
Posts
6,824
Likes
10,493
There is one - it’s called Constellation show and tell.
Unfortunately it’s 114 pages long. 😉

 
Posts
324
Likes
505
There is one - it’s called Constellation show and tell.
Unfortunately it’s 114 pages long. 😉

But worth it to go through if your a Connie nut!