Advice for Omega Seamaster 300 Ref. 165.024

aokinman · Aug 16, 2019

Hello Omega community,

I'm new on forum and would like to have an advice on this Seamaster 300 ref. 165.024 if all parts are correct.
As per my observation, the bezel seems not original.
Is it difficult to find the parts to replace for this ref.?
Thank you

.

JanV · Aug 16, 2019

Sorry to be rude and direct, but are you trying to ask members of the forum if this fake is good enough to start selling?

aokinman · Aug 16, 2019

Oh! sorry. really all fake?
To be honest, I'm not a seller and here to learn.

JanV · Aug 16, 2019

Then this link will provide helpful for you:
https://www.omegaseamaster300.com/
And search the forum for more great information about the SM300, there’s a lot to read and learn here. 😀

JanV · Aug 16, 2019

aokinman
Oh! sorry. really all fake?
To be honest, I'm not a seller and here to learn.

Only the movement is Omega on this watch, most likely not originally from a SM300.

aokinman · Aug 16, 2019

Thank you very much 📖 📖📖

xeasygoingx · Aug 20, 2019

JanV
Sorry to be rude and direct, but are you trying to ask members of the forum if this fake is good enough to start selling?

Fake or Franken? The caseback seems to be original (for a "no-date").

JanV · Aug 20, 2019

xeasygoingx
Fake or Franken? The caseback seems to be original (for a "no-date").

No, not even the caseback is original.

xeasygoingx · Aug 20, 2019

JanV
No, not even the caseback is original.

Can you pls explain why you have come to this conclusion (for learning purposes) … I have compared to the examples shown on omegaseamaster300.com and do not see some conspicuity.

JanV · Aug 20, 2019

xeasygoingx
Can you pls explain why you have come to this conclusion (for learning purposes) … I have compared to the examples shown on omegaseamaster300.com and do not see some conspicuity.

I can recommend to have a look inside the caseback. The pictures are not the best, but should give an idea. I don’t want to be secretive, but not also shout out all the telltales to fakers either. In this case I believe this watch would not be bought based on its caseback alone. 😀

xeasygoingx · Aug 20, 2019

JanV
I can recommend to have a look inside the caseback. The pictures are not the best, but should give an idea. I don’t want to be secretive, but not also shout out all the telltales to fakers either. In this case I believe this watch would not be bought based on its caseback alone. 😀

Ok, got it and agree … my question regarding the caseback was separated from the other parts of the watch 😉. It is unbelievable when you look at the offers across the net how many of them seems to be mixed with parts from different time periods or original and replacement parts.

cvrle1 · Aug 20, 2019

If bezel is fake, which it is, then the case is fake as well. Fake bezel cannot fit on the original case and vice verse.

JanV · Aug 20, 2019

cvrle1
If bezel is fake, which it is, then the case is fake as well. Fake bezel cannot fit on the original case and vice verse.

Yes, and there’s a lot of telltales of this being an absolute fake case.

Advice for Omega Seamaster 300 Ref. 165.024

aokinman

JanV

aokinman

JanV

JanV

aokinman

xeasygoingx

JanV

xeasygoingx

JanV

xeasygoingx

cvrle1

JanV

Similar threads

Seamaster 300 Ref. 2913-7 - Seeking Complete Replacement Bezel (Wearable Solution)

Omega Seamaster 300 ref. 165.024 - Original Owner Watch Project with 552 Movement

UPDATE: Inherited Seamaster 300 Ref. CK 14755-61 SC Restoration

Advice Needed: Period-Correct Crown for Omega Seamaster 2494-3

Is this vintage Omega Seamaster 300 Automatic Ref.165.024 Kaliber 552 - Ebay Auction - genuine and does it look all original?

Replacement crystal for Omega Seamaster 166.0209