About 3 of my vintage omega

[AP1873]

Hello.
I would be happy to know what you think about :
-theses dials ( originals? )
There is no written Swiss made on the second dial ,is it correct ? or redial ?
- the crown (no signed : original ?) on the first photo.

thank you

 

[theluckyluke]

On 1/ Hands and hour marks look quite heterogeneous in terms of aging. Hour mark at 5 and 7 o'clock are thicker than the others.

 

[Fallout Boy]

Are these watches in your possession?

 

[AP1873]

2. Yes
1 and 3 .I am waiting from the seller and get them next week.
I will send a family photo when I have all of them.

 

[Davidt]

Well none of them look like particularly great examples and the single picture of each is poor and insufficient to make a confident statement on dial originality, but 2 and 3 at least look original to me. 1 looks like to also be original but the picture is that poor it’s hard to tell.

If you want to be sure you’ll need better pictures.

 

[AP1873]

You are right.i send photos of the sellers.m3xt week I will try to send betters photos.
This forum is so great , I discovered it 6 months after looking the YouTuber "omega enthusiast" , certainly a member ...

 

[AP1873]

I don't dare to open the caseback,II don't know the reference...

 

[Bruce235]

2 looks to be a redial and the hands have no lume but the dial does. No swiss made.

 

[Hakantasova]

AP1873

I don't dare to open the caseback,II don't know the reference...

If it is 36mm, may be 2504. seems Original dial.