Forums Latest Members
  1. Omega1967 Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    23
    Likes
    69
    I think the strategy is becoming much cleaner
    The steel 321 is likely the 50th version without moonshine gold bezel and fitted with a 321
    Probably with the bracelet too, in effect the 321 is a full steel reissue of the 105.012-64/65- with a regular dial no moon artefacts
    In effect making the 50th anniversary a hybrid model
    The movement from the 50th being used for the regular product
    The differences will be subtle but. I can see collectors buying both as a result

    As for price I reckon the new metas mvt certified will hit £5000 and the 321 knocking on £9000: ie bang on Daytona money

    Just my thoughts

    Now if they make this into the 321...... F88687C4-9787-4BFE-A9EA-08493544728C.jpeg
     
    whyboddau and fskywalker like this.
  2. stuart70 Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    331
    Likes
    195
    I tend to agree. I think that your prices are a little light. I would estimate £5.5 on the metas mvt and just under £10k for the 321.
    The 50th anniversary will be the model for the new metas mvt. speedy. I would expect it to be released eagerly next year. There would be a new snoopy released alongside.
     
  3. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    16,347
    Likes
    44,902
    Your not getting any change from $12-15K for the steel 321
    Don’t forget only 2000 made each year ( and platinum and others getting movements first ) so this is not going to be a off the shelf purchase like most think. ( or of the Top Shelf )
     
    fskywalker and cfracing like this.
  4. Bp1000 Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    622
    Likes
    2,825
    Breguet have said they will deliver 2000 and this could possibly go up if it does well. But unlikely I suspect.

    There has got to be something in it for them. I expect the price to be 30% more than in house. Considering the movement is harder to make than the 1861 and with Breguet’s fee I think that 10-12k is right.

    Probably around the same as the steel and gold anniversary watch.

    Plus if it’s any more you may as well pick up an original.

    It’s also at odds with omega wanting to evolve too. So I’d be surprised to see modern styling. I personally would find it a bit odd to put such an old movement in a modern looking watch. So it’s odd they went with ceramic.