Forums Latest Members
  1. FullyWound Hasn't discovered decaf yet. Dec 3, 2016

    Posts
    972
    Likes
    949
    Is it normal that this case seems so... "un-omega" and why no obvious case reference? what is this watches reference? if indeed it has one.. is it part of the case number? why trying any plausible combination will omegas stupidly difficult to use database not recognise it?
     
    SAM_3606.jpg SAM_3607.jpg SAM_3609.jpg SAM_3613.jpg SAM_3615.jpg SAM_3616.jpg SAM_3617.jpg SAM_3622.jpg SAM_3624.jpg SAM_3626.jpg SAM_3627.jpg SAM_3630.jpg SAM_3631.jpg SAM_3632.jpg
    dougiedude and GregH like this.
  2. mac_omega Dec 3, 2016

    Posts
    3,175
    Likes
    6,725
    first you have to understand how the Omega data base works: you have to know the ref.# - then you can look up the details in case the reference is available in the DB (not all ref. by far are shown).

    This particular watch (as most of the early Omegas) does not have a ref.# in the case back, only the case serial number, and no - the ref# is not part of the case seriall# .

    The only way to get to know the ref# is to apply for an extract from the Omega museum - or you have already the same watch for comparison in your friend´s collection or on the net...
     
  3. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Dec 3, 2016

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    I don't know enough to tell you much about the watch, but I believe that the serial number was stamped in the case back up to a certain time - forties? - when they started with the reference.

    Hopefully a master will be along soon to educate both of us.

    Edit: and mac_omega posted as I was typing!
     
    FullyWound likes this.
  4. FullyWound Hasn't discovered decaf yet. Dec 3, 2016

    Posts
    972
    Likes
    949
    stupid omega... but there seems to be an odd intermediate period that watches both DID and DID NOT have reference numbers? our 2077-1 dates 1939 and 9534405 would put it at around the same era no? according to chuck database.. 1939-1944? so even later than the 2077...

    why so awkward omega why! (and let's not start on bloody american market omegas...)
     
  5. mac_omega Dec 3, 2016

    Posts
    3,175
    Likes
    6,725
    It is not awkward at all - it is due to hstorical changes during time...

    This relates to SS watches only:
    first they started with case serial## then switched to ref# in the case back.
    There might be some transition watches which show both the case serial and the ref# but this is not common at all.

    It is different with gold cased watches:
    Started with case serial## only like the SS versions but later they always had both, the serial# and ref# in the case back.
     
    watchyouwant and Vitezi like this.
  6. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Dec 3, 2016

    Posts
    7,417
    Likes
    20,863
    Very interesting discussion gents.
    And, dibs as I really dig this watch!

    @mac_omega, I was wondering about this because I have a stainless steel issued 30T2SC from 1942 which bears a case serial number inside-- whereas other "air ministry" issued 30T2SC from the same era bear reference 2292 inside. I guess those 2292 are some of the non stainless variants of that watch?
    Or would they be stainless?
    Other similar issued watches are also cased in a dennison case.
     
    Edited Dec 3, 2016
    FullyWound likes this.
  7. mac_omega Dec 3, 2016

    Posts
    3,175
    Likes
    6,725
    I think the watches with ref# 2292 in the case back might be slightly younger - from a time when the switch had already happened - a difference of 1-2 years is enough to see these differences in case marking...
     
    Syrte likes this.
  8. omegastar Dec 3, 2016

    Posts
    1,836
    Likes
    5,323
    They are stupid because 80 years ago they didn't make it easy for you.
    Here is the beginning of the path, with sweep second the ref. is 2220, with small second it might be 2219 or 2221 who knows.
     
  9. heavenscloud Dec 3, 2016

    Posts
    253
    Likes
    127
    The c. 1944-45 2220/2 in my avatar has the ref. number on the case and the case design is similar to yours. Unfortunately, I don't have a photo.
     
  10. FullyWound Hasn't discovered decaf yet. Dec 4, 2016

    Posts
    972
    Likes
    949
    it looks like its really hard to be exact but my doubts over the case are alleviated anyway, the most similar i have found same serial 95xxx and has a reference 1219/3 it seems less have case references than do. and its a minefield of recasing!

    This seems to be an uncommon case for the 30t2 most opting for the more standard snap backs rather than the two piece "fat" cases.. but hey ho looks like they were trial and erroring a VAST quantity of 30t2 cases over decades! i suppose a little like the 30t2 movement itself and its vast VAST variances..
     
  11. Marco schmidt Dec 22, 2019

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
  12. watchyouwant ΩF Clairvoyant Dec 22, 2019

    Posts
    5,141
    Likes
    8,655
     
  13. jeppehh Dec 24, 2019

    Posts
    468
    Likes
    1,308
    First time I stumble on a dial similar to mine, so just wanted to put the two together in the same thread :)

    Different case though.

    IMG_E3487.JPG

    Screenshot 2019-12-24 at 10.50.10.png
     
    janice&fred and felsby like this.
  14. felsby I don't see any option in settings or profile Dec 24, 2019

    Posts
    1,433
    Likes
    5,283
    DIBS :D
     
    jeppehh likes this.
  15. DeltaRomeo Dec 24, 2019

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    22
    Those dials are similar to the one in my late 30s Naiad. The dial of my watch is signed "importee de suisse" and has central seconds. I've never seen a watch with the same dial as mine.
    My watch doesn't have a reference number either, but a serial number for the case.

    IMG_20191224_125518.jpg IMG_20191224_125530.jpg IMG_20191224_125605.jpg
     
  16. jeppehh Dec 24, 2019

    Posts
    468
    Likes
    1,308
    Noted :thumbsup:


    So that’s how the 6 looks :)

    Lovely looking thing @DeltaRomeo!
     
    felsby likes this.