Community Stories

2998-2 o 2998-3? It's not for sale or for purchase | a friend asks me for an opinion

Aditor
Posts
229
Likes
323
Hello everyone. From what I can tell from these not-so-nice photos,
I think it could be a 2998-3 dial or perhaps a 105.002.
Or maybe not oval anymore, a 4 longer than the previous graphics.
Now, my question is: I think the graphics are a little thick.
In that era, I always saw thinner white graphics.
What do you think?

Immagine WhatsApp 2025-10-01 ore 17.17.57_fbfa2b62.webp Immagine WhatsApp 2025-10-01 ore 17.17.57_aa8c12dd.webp
 
M
Posts
48
Likes
78
They seem a bit thicker compared to the 105.002 that I owned a couple of years ago. This one was from 63. Maybe yours is earlier?

IMG_4543.webp
 
Aditor
Posts
229
Likes
323
Is there any omission, sign, text, or character that could raise red flags about its originality?

IMG-20251001-WA0062.webp
 
Aditor
Posts
229
Likes
323
M montbeck
They seem a bit thicker compared to the 105.002 that I owned a couple of years ago. This one was from 63. Maybe yours is earlier?

IMG_4543.webp
ma quanto è bello il tuo orologio!!! 🤩
 
M
Posts
48
Likes
78
Aditor Aditor
Is there any omission, sign, text, or character that could raise red flags about its originality?

IMG-20251001-WA0062.webp
Not to me. Looks fine but ask better opinions
 
Aditor
Posts
229
Likes
323
Can anyone tell me why some 2998 dials have concentric circular imprints in the compax and others have smooth surfaces?
 
Sign up or log in to reply...