Forums Latest Members
  1. WatchCor Jul 7, 2020

    Posts
    731
    Likes
    1,414
    Hi all

    As per usual I was perusing the internet for watches and spotted this beauty for sale:

    A 222101/1

    14473705-su2izob17.jpg 14473705-pftv26g2jx5kjreuw23ggux8-Zoom.jpg

    Coincidentally the exact same watch has been recently sold by Shuck the Oyster.

    1_006.jpg 1_014.jpg

    The original sales ad states or can be easily undestood as all the hands are original. I quote:"The original dial is very clean and clear, showing original tritium luminous mass. Same goes for the hands. "

    I personally have not seen that type of chronohand on my searches and lurkings. I love look of the brushed finish on the dial and the Martel movements are a plus on these. If that were original chrono hand I might consider making an offer on this.

    P.s. how hard on a scale : "1-to-build an orbital class rocket" would sourcing a "correct" chronohand be?
     
  2. keywerd Jul 7, 2020

    Posts
    114
    Likes
    276
    I am going to go with an 8.
     
  3. WatchCor Jul 8, 2020

    Posts
    731
    Likes
    1,414
    Hmmm , so not that hard considering the other extreme of that difficulty scale :p.

    So I take it that also in your opinion that chrono hand is a replacement?
     
  4. bgrisso Jul 8, 2020

    Posts
    3,128
    Likes
    6,887
    yes. That is a 281 IIRC ? They seem a bit harder to find than 285 and the like, although if the current hand has a tube size that fits correctly, you might be able to take a hand from another caliber and swap the tube. Or just keep a patient eye out for a 281...
     
    WatchCor likes this.
  5. bgrisso Jul 8, 2020

    Posts
    3,128
    Likes
    6,887
    The chrono minute hand Reset looks wrong in the first pic but ok in the others, maybe just double check it’s all working correctly
     
    WatchCor likes this.
  6. WatchCor Jul 8, 2020

    Posts
    731
    Likes
    1,414
    Thanks for the input. Yes its a UG 281.

    Damn it, I think my lack of know-how will not enable to do that and I am somewhat certain my watchmakers are not keen on tinkering with tubeswitching and such.

    That is a very good looking combination even with the wrong chronohand. I'll do some research to see how often those 281's popup and the possibility of harvesting a correct chronohand.

    Edit: just like you mentioned, already found a correct looking chrono hand but for the 285. Found a few correct chronohands on 281's but their still attached to perfectly good looking watches :oops:.

    Maybe I'll just sit around and hope that somebody snaggs that. In my opinion 5100 USD + VAT(EU) is quite alot for a "find the correct hand"-project watch.
     
    Edited Jul 8, 2020
  7. Diabolik Jul 9, 2020

    Posts
    1,374
    Likes
    2,664
    222101's are 281 powered 227XX are V72 or caliber 130 powered. That hand is wrong but it is a really nice example of a 222101. Very difficult to find in that condition ! Hand will be difficult to find but not impossible. I actually think it is worth a punt.

    :)
     
    WatchCor likes this.
  8. WatchCor Jul 9, 2020

    Posts
    731
    Likes
    1,414
    Thanks for the input but please:
     
    giphy (1).gif
  9. bgrisso Jul 9, 2020

    Posts
    3,128
    Likes
    6,887
    I had a 222101/1 which was one of the better examples I have seen (unpolished case, very nice condition overall). I sold it this year for quite a bit more than the asking price on the one in this thread. I do miss it.
     
    P1010604_adj.jpg
    ikanbilisclub and WatchCor like this.
  10. bgrisso Jul 9, 2020

    Posts
    3,128
    Likes
    6,887
    there's a quite nice 22705 for sale here in the private sales section (not me), worth considering if you are not set on the textured dial....
     
    jsflog, WatchCor and jumpingsecond like this.