220 bezel price vs DNN

Posts
3,174
Likes
7,329
Tend to agree with you. It's possible! Everything is possible back then and we'll never know.
Still, I'd rather speculate on this watch returned to the shop somewhen later the year for whatever reason 馃榾
Well, it's a family piece ... @cstoitsis - can you cast light on the question?
 
Posts
147
Likes
28
Tend to agree with you. It's possible! Everything is possible back then and we'll never know.
Still, I'd rather speculate on this watch returned to the shop somewhen later the year for whatever reason 馃榾

I have confused with Premoon and the moon landing date in my head. It's correct what you wrote, this serial is from the first quarter 1970, I have a -69 with a very close serial that is from March 1970 馃槈

The watch has been regularly serviced since new.
My father does not recall a bezel change.
 
Posts
147
Likes
28
The watch has been regularly serviced since new.
My father does not recall a bezel change.

The watch was built first quarter of 1970.
My father purchased it new Dec 1972
 
Posts
468
Likes
1,324
Totally agree. The 220 bezels were used only for a few month between serial 3059 (end of 1970) and 31004xx (beginning of 1971). It is (at least for me) the rarest of the three main bezel types (DON, DNN, 220). Many of them were changed from Omega because of the 220 error. I would value it minimal like a DON variation of not higher.

Just to be sure. Does this mean that watches sold within this period could have been sold with either a 220 or DNN? Not all were sold with 220?
 
Posts
18,202
Likes
27,530
Just to be sure. Does this mean that watches sold within this period could have been sold with either a 220 or DNN? Not all were sold with 220?
It appears the 220鈥檚 where made as a batch, but serials are not necessarily in order.

@Cal_321 at this time 220鈥檚 are only worth slightly more then DNN鈥檚 far below DON鈥檚.

The production was, DON, 220, DNN. Basically the 220 was the first batch of DNN s.
 
Posts
468
Likes
1,324
It appears the 220鈥檚 where made as a batch, but serials are not necessarily in order.

So this means that 220 are spread out within this serial range amongst some DNN? With the 220 being the first but not in serial order.
 
Posts
24,246
Likes
53,990
Just to be sure. Does this mean that watches sold within this period could have been sold with either a 220 or DNN? Not all were sold with 220?

Please see a very detailed discussion on pages 123-124 of Moonwatch Only.
 
Posts
610
Likes
3,834
This is absolutely the right answer... for now ... until the Rolex type of collector gets into Omega. See what a little bit of red ink can do for the price of a sub and we will see the same thing happening to Speedies in the future. I have no doubt about that. When is the only question.

This is why I opted to snag a 220 for my 30593xxx Sept 70 Speedy. It was available and I got it for a reasonable price so I thought why not?? At the very least it makes my watch a bit more interesting from a collectible standpoint and being a Rolex collector I鈥檓 hoping that the Omega crowd starts catching on to it as a cool variant.

 
Posts
18,202
Likes
27,530
So this means that 220 are spread out within this serial range amongst some DNN? With the 220 being the first but not in serial order.

I think research via extracts show they are clumped together by date. Serial numbers are not fully sequential.
 
Posts
468
Likes
1,324
Please see a very detailed discussion on pages 123-124 of Moonwatch Only.

Thanks for the reference. Don鈥檛 own the book yet unfortunately.
 
Posts
542
Likes
1,806
This is why I opted to snag a 220 for my 30593xxx Sept 70 Speedy. It was available and I got it for a reasonable price so I thought why not?? At the very least it makes my watch a bit more interesting from a collectible standpoint and being a Rolex collector I鈥檓 hoping that the Omega crowd starts catching on to it as a cool variant.


very close to mine which has a 30.592.xxx serial.
 
Posts
278
Likes
429
@Cal_321 at this time 220鈥檚 are only worth slightly more then DNN鈥檚 far below DON鈥檚.
You're right, unfortunately. Not discovered and underestimated yet.
 
Posts
291
Likes
1,394
In the words of one of my favorite artists; Perfection is standard, mistakes cost extra.