Forums Latest Members

2 Polerouters arrived today 215 vs 218

  1. Ko1892 May 26, 2016

    Posts
    715
    Likes
    4,569
    I have been looking for a SS Polerouter for a while. Suddenly received these 2 today:D

    The left one is 215-2 the other is 218-2

    Since i am only started on UG, any comment on the watches would be welcome:thumbsup:

    Cheers
    Ko
     
    20160526_215110.jpg 20160526_215318.jpg received_10207536191737583.jpeg s-l16003.jpg
  2. Severin May 26, 2016

    Posts
    531
    Likes
    2,011
    Gorgeous dials on both of them. Congrats. Also, I learn something new everyday: I would have expected to see Microtor on the 215-2 dial; at first glance, I thought it belonged to a 218 or 69. Thanks for sharing.

    (edit; p.s. It's interesting to see the pointy U shield on the 215-2. In my experience, it is the rarer of shield types found on a 215).
     
    Ko1892 likes this.
  3. Ko1892 May 26, 2016

    Posts
    715
    Likes
    4,569
    Thanks for your response, Severin.
    I am now a big fan of Polerouter :thumbsup:

    Cheers
    KO
     
  4. Jonatan May 27, 2016

    Posts
    1,783
    Likes
    4,006
    Yes very nice! Could you take a picture of the two crowns for future reference? There are many variations and I would love to make sense of it. Do you know if the cyclops crystal is original on the 218-2?
     
    DaveK and Ko1892 like this.
  5. Ko1892 May 27, 2016

    Posts
    715
    Likes
    4,569
    Will send some pixtures of the crown. The date window has the same trapezoid shape and fit very well but i dont see any UG logo on the crystal... so maybe it is not original??

    Cheers
    Ko
     
    20160527_130218.jpg 20160527_130133.jpg 20160527_130845.jpg
    Benbradstock, Gavin, Giff2577 and 2 others like this.
  6. jfwoodman May 27, 2016

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    954
    Very nice - congrats on the pair! I'm not a fan of the bubble windows, but the dial and hands on the 218-2 look super sharp.
     
    Ko1892 likes this.
  7. Ko1892 May 27, 2016

    Posts
    715
    Likes
    4,569
    Here are the crowns as requested :thumbsup:
    The first one is on the cal 218, which is significantly bigger than the one on the cal 215.

    Cheers
    Ko
     
    20160528_000514.jpg 20160528_000407.jpg 20160528_000640-01.jpeg
    Benbradstock and Giff2577 like this.
  8. Dre May 27, 2016

    Posts
    1,927
    Likes
    22,622
    Wow congrats, lovely examples! :thumbsup:

    Interesting about the dial on the 215-2, thought that the dial with that particular shield comes on the later examples. Can you see any serial number on the case somewhere? Maybe look with loupe under a light in between the lugs if you can't seem to see any!
     
  9. Ko1892 May 27, 2016

    Posts
    715
    Likes
    4,569
    Hi there
    Will definately look for the serial tomorrow. I did a bit of research and found this sample with the same shield and Cal215-2 from Polerouter - collection ;)

    Cherrs
    Ko
     
    polerouter62-big.jpg
  10. glennberger Sep 4, 2019

    Posts
    55
    Likes
    35
    Are the 215-2 and 218-2 crowns interchangeable? I have otherwise perfect 218-2 Polerouter Date that has an unmarked replacement crown. I also have a broken 215-2 non-date with an intact case and crown (the 215-2 was smashed — please don't ask what happened — it was tragic). Will the crown on the 215-2 fit the 218-2? I don't want to create a franken but in the interim wearing something more correct would put me at ease. Thoughts?
     
  11. CafeRacer Sep 4, 2019

    Posts
    388
    Likes
    879
    Firstly, all 215-2 movements had a date function.
    https://universalgenevepolerouter.com/movements/
    Can you post some photos of yours? (movement, dial, and outside of caseback)

    Crowns (with tubes) are essentially all interchangeable for polerouters.
    However, specific model references came with specific crowns, so despite being all interchangeable they are not all correct.
    If you post some photos, and reference/serial numbers, we can chime in on what needs to be done to restore it correctly.
     
    Benbradstock likes this.
  12. CafeRacer Sep 4, 2019

    Posts
    388
    Likes
    879
    And in reference back to the old OP (in case he is still reading), the left one looks like a completely correct early serial 204610-x (-1 or -6??) and the right looks like a completely correct 204612-1. :)
     
    Benbradstock likes this.
  13. glennberger Sep 4, 2019

    Posts
    55
    Likes
    35
    Hi. Are you Hamblar at IG? You rock!
     
    CafeRacer likes this.
  14. CafeRacer Sep 5, 2019

    Posts
    388
    Likes
    879
    I've been telling people this for such a long time - you're the first to believe me ::bleh::
    Post a photo of the back, front, sides and movement, measure the plexi diameter, lug width, and case diameter when you receive it, or send a private message with the photos and measurements, and ill try to work out what it is/was/should be. :thumbsup:
     
    pmontoyap likes this.
  15. Theluglife Sep 5, 2019

    Posts
    134
    Likes
    154
    wow, the cases and lugs on these two look different. @CafeRacer is there a section on the website about the subtle differences in case designs of polerouters?
     
  16. CafeRacer Sep 6, 2019

    Posts
    388
    Likes
    879
    Not yet - but there might be a short article on it in the future.
    Quite a few of the references have some specific case details to tell them apart, but unfortunately its not something that I can write up quickly.
    Im trying to keep the site as structured as possible, and going from the big stuff (like what are the different reference numbers, what are the associated geometries for parts), and slowly working in to the details (printing, crosshair, and lume plot changes within references).
     
  17. Theluglife Sep 6, 2019

    Posts
    134
    Likes
    154
    Thanks @CafeRacer . You efforts with the site are extraordinary. Can't thank you enough for it
     
    Severin and CafeRacer like this.