- Posts
- 77
- Likes
- 43
maximilian g
·thank you very much for that
Edited:
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
so im now confused, (wich is not hard these days)
so unlike other watch companies omega did not use a 7750 in the 1970's in any form?
Correct. Omega was part of SSIH, as was Lemania. Lemania made all of Omega's chronograph movements until after the industry realigned in the 1980s.
As for the Chuck Maddox article, I have read it and am familiar. He clearly was convinced it was a put together watch after his correspondence with Omega. The case may have been PVD or DLC (or just a bad photo) but there's nothing to suggest that it was a factory finish. I'm not aware of that type of finish on any Omega watches in the early 70s when they were using cal. 1040.
Not a 1970s 7750. Per A Journey Through Time the earliest Omega use of cal. 7750 based caliber was 1150 in 1990, which was initially offered in 17J.
thank you very much for that
so im now confused, (wich is not hard these days)
so unlike other watch companies omega did not use a 7750 in the 1970's in any form?
even though this is about later changes with the 5100 and 7750 it doesn't dissmiss the possiblity that Omega could have been looking internally at this in the 70's ?
this is an extract from watch legends
In the late 1990's there seemed to be more firms who had previously produced automatic chronographs exclusively or primarily with the Lemania 5100 introduced new models with the Valjoux 7750 either in parallel with their 5100 offerings or to replace them. Bell & Ross introduced the Space 3 in two varieties of 7750, Revue Thommen replaced their Airspeed (5100 Based) with a Airspeed II (7750) line, and so on. So while Tutima, Sinn and others soldiered on the long-termviabilityavailability of the Lemania 5100 seemed to be on shaky ground at best. Most of us who watch the currents of the Swiss watch industry while conceeding that some of this was probably attributible to firms wishing to keep their costs down in a world economy seemingly loosing steam since the "Asian Contagion" in 1997 and hence maintaining profits, the more open-minded of us would mention that perhaps the close shave the 5100 had with the executioner's block may have scared off firms who wished to produce 5100's, or perhaps a steady stream of supply wasn't as easy to obtain as the ETA/Valjoux 7750.
Both Omega and Lemania was under the same ownership, SSIH, until SSIH sold Lemania in order to raise funds in the early 1980s.
You will not find Valjoux based 70s Omega. Valjoux was a competitor to SSIH at the time.
That set was on Ebay in December. I was curious too, but I think the seller's "baggie" was someone's never-completed franken project. My best guesses:
-Mid-Case could be a custom-PVD case to a 176.007 or similar
-crystal/bezel could be from a 176.0010 or a Tissot Navigator
-Caseback =?? Who knows. I'm leaning fake.
Omega never branded it "7750", it was always modified and relabeled as an Omega calibre. Even so, the outside of the caseback is not marked in anyway similar to how Omega did in the past. And Omega using a Valjoux 7750, even in a prototype, makes no sense at all for the 1970s, as Valjoux and Lemania were rivals at this time.